Case Note & Summary
The judgment arose from a batch of cases challenging reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution of India, with the Supreme Court tasked to clarify the legal framework established in M. Nagaraj v. Union of India. The background involved historical amendments to Article 16, including the insertion of Articles 16(4-A) and 16(4-B) to allow reservation in promotions with consequential seniority and exclude backlog vacancies from the 50% ceiling, respectively, following the Indra Sawhney case which initially restricted reservation in promotions. The facts centered on disputes over whether State governments had complied with the requirement to collect quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation of SCs and STs in public employment, as mandated by M. Nagaraj, with various High Court judgments being appealed. The legal issues were formulated into six points: the yardstick for quantifiable data, the unit for data collection, the use of population proportion as a test, the need for a time period to review inadequacy, the prospective operation of M. Nagaraj, and the permissibility of sampling methods for data collection. Arguments were presented by the learned Attorney General and other counsel, focusing on the need for clarity to avoid multiple litigations and the State's discretion in implementing reservations. The court's analysis emphasized that Articles 16(4) and 16(4-A) are enabling provisions, with no fixed yardstick for adequacy as it depends on variable factors like efficiency and local conditions, and that the State must collect data based on the cadre as the unit, using methods including sampling. It rejected population proportion as the sole test and did not mandate a specific review period, while affirming the prospective operation of M. Nagaraj. The decision provided guidance on these issues, directing that the State's exercise of discretion must be supported by quantifiable data and compliance with Article 335, without laying down rigid criteria, thereby resolving the batch of cases by clarifying the legal standards for reservation in promotions.
Headnote
A) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Yardstick for Quantifiable Data - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A), 335 - The Court addressed the yardstick for arriving at quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in public employment for reservation in promotions under Article 16(4-A). It held that there is no fixed yardstick, as adequacy depends on variable factors like efficiency, backwardness, and local conditions, and the State must collect data based on cadre as the unit. The decision is left to the administration to optimize conflicting claims in context. (Paras 10-13)
B) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Unit for Data Collection - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A) - The Court considered the unit with respect to which quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation is required to be collected. It indicated that the unit is the cadre, as data collection depends on local prevailing conditions in public employment, and the State must assess representation within specific cadres. (Paras 10, 12)
C) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Population Proportion Test - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A) - The Court examined whether the proportion of the population of SCs and STs to the population of India should be taken as the test for determining adequacy of representation in promotional posts. It held that population proportion is not the sole test, as adequacy involves multiple factors beyond demographic ratios, and the State must consider broader data. (Paras 10, 12)
D) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Time Period for Review - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A) - The Court addressed whether there should be a time period for reviewing inadequacy of representation. It did not mandate a specific time period, leaving it to the State to periodically assess representation based on evolving conditions and data. (Paras 10, 12)
E) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Prospective Operation of M. Nagaraj - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A) - The Court considered whether the judgment in M. Nagaraj v. Union of India operates prospectively. It held that M. Nagaraj operates prospectively, as clarified in earlier proceedings, and does not affect prior promotions or reservations. (Paras 2, 10)
F) Constitutional Law - Reservation in Promotions - Sampling Methods for Data Collection - Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 16(4-A) - The Court examined whether quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation can be collected on the basis of sampling methods, as held in B.K. Pavitra II. It indicated that sampling methods are permissible, as data collection can involve various techniques including sampling, subject to reliability and context. (Paras 10, 12)
Issue of Consideration
What is the yardstick for arriving at quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation of SCs and STs in public employment for reservation in promotions under Article 16(4-A)?
Final Decision
The Court formulated six points for determination and provided clarifications: no fixed yardstick for quantifiable data, unit for data collection is cadre, population proportion not sole test, no mandated time period for review, M. Nagaraj operates prospectively, and sampling methods are permissible for data collection.
Law Points
- Reservation in promotions under Article 16(4-A) is an enabling provision subject to quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation
- no fixed yardstick for adequacy
- unit for data collection is cadre
- population proportion not sole test
- time period for review not mandated
- M. Nagaraj operates prospectively
- sampling methods permissible for data collection
Case Details
Civil Appeal No. 629 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 30621 of 2011) W I T H Civil Appeal No. 630 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.31735 of 2011) Civil Appeal No. 631 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 35000 of 2011) Civil Appeal No. 632 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.2839 of 2012) Civil Appeal No. 636 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 5859 of 2012) Civil Appeal No. 635 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 5860 of 2012) Civil Appeal No. 633 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 4831 of 2012) Civil Appeal No. 637 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 30841 of 2012) Civil Appeal No. 638 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 6915 of 2014) Civil Appeal No. 642 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 23344 of 2014) Civil Appeal No. 753 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1332 of 2022) (D. No. 35818 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 759 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.1347 of 2022) (D. No. 30694 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 643-644 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.23339-23340 of 2014) Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 21343 of 2015) Civil Appeal Nos. 703-704 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 14549-14550 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 735 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 845 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 645 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 33163 of 2014) Civil Appeal No. 713 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 25756 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 648 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31191 of 2015) Civil Appeal Nos. 4876-4877 of 2017 Civil Appeal Nos. 4878-4879 of 2017 Civil Appeal No. 4880 of 2017 Civil Appeal No. 4881 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.4882 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.11817 of 2016 Civil Appeal No.11816 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 11820 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 651 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 31240 of 2016) Civil Appeal No. 4833 of 2017 Civil Appeal Nos.701-704 of 2017 Civil Appeal Nos. 11822-11825 of 2016 Civil Appeal Nos.11837-11840 of 2016 Civil Appeal Nos.11842-11845 of 2016 Civil Appeal Nos. 11829-11832 of 2016 Civil Appeal Nos. 11847-11850 of 2016 Civil Appeal No.11828 of 2016 Contempt Petition (C) No.13 of 2017 In Civil Appeal Nos.4562-4564 of 2017 Civil Appeal No. 734 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 626 of 2020) Civil Appeal Nos. 724-727 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 28164-28167 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 736 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.851 of 2020) Contempt Petition (C) No.11 of 2017 In Civil Appeal Nos.4562-4564 of 2017 Civil Appeal Nos.4562-4564 of 2017 Contempt Petition (C) No.314 of 2016 In SLP (C) No.4831 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.5247 of 2016 T.P.(C) Nos. 608-609 of 2017 Civil Appeal No. 652 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.10638 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 764 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1354 of 2022) (CC No. 6821 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 656 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18844 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 654-655 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 19422-19423 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 647 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.25191 of 2015) Civil Appeal No. 649 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.33688 of 2015) Civil Appeal No. 650 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.31425 of 2016) Civil Appeal No. 653 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.17491 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 657 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.24681 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 663 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 32944 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 754 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1336 of 2022) (D. No. 28776 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 755 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1338 of 2022) (D. No. 29066 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 768-775 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1359-1366 of 2022) (D. No. 30189 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 752 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1202 of 2022) (D. No. 31145 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 659-660 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 28446-28447 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 658 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.28306 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 683-694 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.13993-14004 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 661 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 30942 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 765 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1356 of 2022) (D. No. 33488 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 761-763 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.1351-1353 of 2022) (D. No. 34271 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 777-780 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1370-1373 of 2022) (D. No.34520 of 2017) Civil Appeal Nos. 695-702 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.14105-14112 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 766 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1357 of 2022) (D. No. 35577 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 776 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1367 of 2022) (D. No. 36305 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 767 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1358 of 2022) (D. No.36377 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 662 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.31288 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. of 2022) (D. No.38895 of 2017) Civil Appeal No. 677 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13719 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 678 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13720 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 670 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28842 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 671 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28844 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 679 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.13721 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 672 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28846 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 673 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28847 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 674 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28848 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 707-708 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 21309-21310 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 782 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1376 of 2022) (D. No.28194 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 757 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1345 of 2022) (D. No. 34750 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 715-723 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.27951-27959 of 2019) Civil Appeal Nos. 681-682 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.13974-13975 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 756 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1339 of 2022) (D. No.41552 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 666 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.18925 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 750-751 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1199-1200 of 2022) (D. No.22349 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 667 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.22985 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 747-749 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1196-1198 of 2022) (D. No.23907 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 668-669 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.27401-27402 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 758 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1346 of 2022) (D. No.30693 of 2018) Contempt Petition (C) No.985 of 2018 In Civil Appeal No.5247 of 2016 Civil Appeal No. 516 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1201 of 2022) (D. No.24594 of 2018) Civil Appeal No. 705 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.14611 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 760 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1348 of 2022) (D. No.39571 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 675-676 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.5724-5725 of 2019) Civil Appeal Nos. 517-519 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.10551-10553 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 706 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.18314 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 711 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.21364 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 634 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.20777 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 680 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.22246 of 2019) Contempt Petition (C) No.1067 of 2019 In SLP (C) No.30621 of 2011 Civil Appeal Nos. 522-627 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 110-215 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 714 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.26891 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 730 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 29159 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 729 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.29152 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 732 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 571 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 728 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.29150 of 2019) Writ Petition (C) No. 1371 of 2019 Civil Appeal No. 731 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.29234 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 1078 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 920 of 2020) Civil Appeal No.1004 of 2020 Civil Appeal No.2434 of 2019 Civil Appeal No. 664 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1132 of 2018) Civil Appeal Nos. 738-739 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.2395-2396 of 2020) Civil Appeal Nos. 709-710 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 1326-1327 of 2022) (D. No.43894 of 2019) Civil Appeal No. 737 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 887 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 733 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 609 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 741 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 7332 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 740 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 6834 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 742 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 8066 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 743 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 8588 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 744 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.15749 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 628 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.15148 of 2020) Civil Appeal No. 745 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 639 of 2021) Civil Appeal No. 746 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3684 of 2021) Contempt Petition (C) Nos.200-201 of 2021 In SLP (C) Nos.5724-5725 of 2019 Contempt Petition (C) Nos.211-212 of 2021 In Civil Appeal No.5247 of 2016 Writ Petition (C) No. 882 of 2021 Contempt Petition (C) Nos.378-379 of 2021 In Civil Appeal Nos.11837-11840 of 2016
Lachhmi Narain Gupta & Ors.
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Challenges to reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution, alleging non-compliance with quantifiable data requirements as per M. Nagaraj v. Union of India
Filing Reason
Assailing judgments of High Courts that dealt with reservation in promotions provided by Central and State Governments to SCs and STs as violative of M. Nagaraj
Previous Decisions
Indra Sawhney held no reservation in promotions under Article 16(4); M. Nagaraj upheld constitutional amendments but required quantifiable data for backwardness and inadequacy of representation; Jarnail Singh rejected reconsideration of M. Nagaraj but invalidated requirement for quantifiable data on backwardness for SCs/STs
Issues
What is the yardstick by which, according to M. Nagaraj (supra), one would arrive at quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation of SCs and STs in public employment?
What is the unit with respect to which quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation is required to be collected?
Whether proportion of the population of SCs and STs to the population of India should be taken to be the test for determining adequacy of representation in promotional posts for the purposes of Article 16(4-A)?
Should there be a time period for reviewing inadequacy of representation?
Whether the judgment in M. Nagaraj (supra) can be said to operate prospectively?
Whether quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation can be collected on the basis of sampling methods, as held by this Court in B.K. Pavitra & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.?
Submissions/Arguments
The learned Attorney General argued that the Court did not indicate any test for determining adequacy of representation in M. Nagaraj and submitted the importance of deciding the yardstick to avoid multiple litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Articles 16(4) and 16(4-A) are enabling provisions; the State's discretion to provide reservation in promotions for SCs and STs is subject to collection of quantifiable data showing inadequacy of representation, with no fixed yardstick as it depends on variable factors like efficiency and local conditions, and data should be collected based on cadre as the unit, using methods including sampling.
Judgment Excerpts
“Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation in matters of promotion, with consequential seniority, to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which, in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State.”
“There is no fixed yardstick to identify equality, justice and efficiency which are variable factors and it depends on the facts and circumstances of each case.”
Procedural History
Leave granted except Diary No.38895/2017; cases tagged together due to similar issues; on 18.01.2021, direction to submit issues to Attorney General; on 14.09.2021, hearing held with submissions on identified issues; six points formulated for determination.
Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India, 1950: Article 16(4), Article 16(4-A), Article 16(4-B), Article 335
