WP(MD)No.6979 of 2021
19 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "Representation disposal"
2127 result(s) found
Found 2127 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Poramboke Land. Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation within Stipulated Time.
6 Jan 2025The petitioner, Karikalan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seek...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Resettlement Project Due to Unexplained Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners' challenge to 2006 order of Divisional Commissioner fails as they failed to demonstrate diligence after personal hearing in 2005.
25 Oct 2024The petitioners, four individuals who are grandchildren of the original landowner Babasaheb Khadirsaheb Pirjade, filed a writ petition in 2018 challen...
- 403
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Lands and Common Pathway. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
27 Jan 2025The petitioner, A. Devadass, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 t...
- 111
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment of Government Poromboke Lands — Duty of Statutory Authority to Consider Representation within Stipulated Time. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
21 Jan 2025The petitioner, T. Muniyandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...
- 70
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Government Poromboke Street. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
23 Jan 2025The petitioner, N.Manikandan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...
- 69
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Cultural Program in Shivaratri Festival. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
10 Jan 2025The petitioner, Sivanath Babu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ...
- 22
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation for Removal of Encroachment on Government Poromboke Street — Mandamus Issued for Disposal Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
23 Jan 2025The petitioner, N.Manikandan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seeki...
- 15
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Road Encroachment — Mandamus Issued for Removal of Alleged Encroachment on Cart Track. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation Within Three Months; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
30 Jan 2025The petitioner, N.S. Krishnamaraja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High C...
- 144
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Pre-Execution Challenge to Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA; Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Grounds for Interference are Limited to Five Exhaustive Grounds as per Gadia’s Case. Court Rejects Request to Allow Fresh Representation Under Section 11 When Prior Representation Already Rejected, Holding that It Cannot Direct Government to Review Its Decision.
5 Jan 2011(1) Background: Three criminal writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of detention orders passed un...
- 69
