Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Cultural Program in Shivaratri Festival. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sivanath Babu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents (District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tahsildar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, and Inspector of Police) to grant permission and protection to conduct a 'Kida-Muttu Cultural Program' scheduled on 23.02.2025 from 08.00 a.m. to 03.00 p.m. in connection with the 'Shivaratri Festival' at Arulmigu Aathi Sivan Thirukovil in N.Ayyampatti Village, Nattamangalam, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. The petitioner had submitted a representation to the respondents on 19.12.2024, but it was not considered, prompting the filing of the writ petition. The court observed that whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty to consider it on its merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 on its own merits and pass orders in accordance with law within two weeks from receipt of a copy of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any views on the merits of the matter. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Duty of Statutory Authority - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty - Court directed respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 on its own merits and pass orders within two weeks (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representation seeking permission and protection for a cultural program.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Duty of statutory authority to consider representation
  • Non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty
  • Writ of Mandamus under Article 226
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 253

W.P.(MD)No.1081 of 2025

2025-01-10

M.S.RAMESH, A.D.MARIA CLETE

Mr.P.Suresh, Mr.J.Ashok, Mr.P.Kottaisamy

Sivanath Babu

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirumangalam Division, Madurai District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Sindhupatti Police Station, Madurai District.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking Mandamus to direct respondents to grant permission and protection for a cultural program.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 and grant permission and protection for Kida-Muttu Cultural Program.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of representation by respondents.

Issues

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representation seeking permission and protection for a cultural program.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted representation dated 19.12.2024 which was not considered. Respondents did not file counter or raise objections.

Ratio Decidendi

Whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying invocation of extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed representation on 19.12.2024; no response; filed W.P.(MD)No.1081 of 2025; taken up for final disposal at admission stage by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Cultural Program in Shivaratri Festival. Statutory Authority Must Consider Representation on Merits Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Not Agricultural Land. Land adjacent to five-star hotels with high sale price and lack of systematic cultivation fails to qualify as agricultural land unde...