Search Results for "government service removal"

1856 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1856 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Quashing Dismissal of Naval Employee for Non-Service of Charge Sheet. Failure to Serve Charge Sheet at Correct Address Violates Natural Justice, Disciplinary Proceedings Vitiated.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and naval authorities against a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Record — Belated Claim After 30 Years of Service Not Entertained. Petitioner sought correction of date of birth from 12/12/1962 to 12/03/1966 but failed to explain delay and lacked contemporaneous evidence.

The petitioner, Prabhakar Yashwant Salve, was an employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. He filed a writ petition seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Challenge to MHT-CET 2019 Answer Keys and Evaluation Process. Court Directs Re-evaluation of Disputed Questions and Issuance of Revised Merit Lists for Admission to Professional Courses.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by students who appeared for the Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MHT-CET) 2019 for admission to profe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...