Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract was renewed for 11 months from 3rd June 2017 to 2nd May 2018 on a consolidated monthly honorarium of Rs.25,000/-. She applied for maternity leave from 13th June 2017 to 30th November 2017, which was permitted. However, upon her return, the respondent failed to pay her salary for the maternity leave period. The petitioner made representations citing the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, but received no response, leading her to file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court considered the applicability of the Maternity Benefit Act to contractual employees. The respondents argued that the Act does not apply to establishments with less than 10 employees and that the petitioner was a contractual employee not covered by the Act. The court rejected these arguments, holding that the Act applies to all establishments as per Section 2, and that the definition of 'woman' under the Act includes all women, regardless of their employment status. The court emphasized that maternity benefit is a fundamental right under Article 21 and cannot be denied on the basis of contractual employment. The court directed the respondents to pay the petitioner maternity benefit at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per month for the period from 13th June 2017 to 30th November 2017 within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Maternity Benefit - Contractual Employee - Entitlement to Maternity Benefit - Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, Sections 5, 2 - The petitioner, a contractual Project Officer, was denied maternity benefit for the period of her maternity leave from 13th June 2017 to 30th November 2017. The court held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to all establishments, including those employing contractual employees, and that denial of maternity benefit to a woman on account of her contractual status is unconstitutional and violative of Article 21. The court directed the respondent to pay the maternity benefit at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per month for the said period within four weeks. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a contractual employee is entitled to maternity benefit under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay the petitioner maternity benefit at the rate of Rs.25,000/- per month for the period from 13th June 2017 to 30th November 2017 within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Maternity Benefit Act
  • 1961 applies to all establishments irrespective of number of employees
  • Contractual employees are entitled to maternity benefit
  • Denial of maternity benefit to contractual employee is violative of Article 21 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 46

WRIT PETITION NO. 3491 OF 2018

2018-10-19

B.R. Gavai, M.S. Karnik

Ms. Rutuja Shinde h/f. Mr. Devendra Dilip Pawar for the petitioner, Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Archana D/o. Nanabhau Dahifale

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to pay maternity benefit.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondent No.2 to pay salaries on pay scale of Rs.25,000/- per month for the period of her maternity leave from 13th June, 2017 to 30th November, 2017.

Filing Reason

Respondent No.2 failed to pay maternity benefit despite requests and representations.

Issues

Whether a contractual employee is entitled to maternity benefit under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to all establishments and she is entitled to maternity benefit. Respondents argued that the Act does not apply to establishments with less than 10 employees and that the petitioner being a contractual employee is not covered.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to all establishments and contractual employees are entitled to maternity benefit. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis is unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 applies to all establishments and the petitioner being a woman is entitled to the benefit of the said Act. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on the ground that she is a contractual employee would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India after the respondent failed to pay maternity benefit despite representations. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 19th October 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maternity Benefit Act, 1961: Sections 5, 2
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Appeal Against NCDRC Order on Delayed Flat Possession: Developer's 9% Interest Demand Quashed. Supreme Court overturns NCDRC's direction allowing the developer to charge 9% interest on the balance payment; possession to be handed over within 30 days...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.