Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Record — Belated Claim After 30 Years of Service Not Entertained. Petitioner sought correction of date of birth from 12/12/1962 to 12/03/1966 but failed to explain delay and lacked contemporaneous evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Prabhakar Yashwant Salve, was an employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. He filed a writ petition seeking correction of his date of birth in the service record from 12/12/1962 to 12/03/1966, and consequently, a change in his superannuation date from 31/12/2020 to 31/03/2024. The petitioner had joined service in 1991 and his date of birth was recorded as 12/12/1962 based on the school leaving certificate. In 2020, he submitted a proposal for correction, claiming that his actual date of birth was 12/03/1966 as per his birth certificate. The respondents did not decide the proposal, leading to the petition. The court examined the issue of delay and laches, noting that the petitioner had served for nearly 30 years without raising any objection to the recorded date of birth. The court observed that the petitioner failed to produce any contemporaneous document to support his claim and that the school leaving certificate, which was the basis of the original entry, was a reliable document. The court held that correction of date of birth at the fag end of service cannot be claimed as a matter of right and that the employer cannot be faulted for relying on the documents submitted at the time of entry. The petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Correction of Date of Birth - Delay and Laches - Petitioner sought correction of date of birth from 12/12/1962 to 12/03/1966 after 30 years of service, just before superannuation - Court held that such belated claims cannot be entertained unless there is clear and contemporaneous evidence and the employer is not at fault - Petitioner failed to explain delay and did not produce any contemporaneous document - Petition dismissed (Paras 1-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to correction of his date of birth in the service record after a delay of nearly 30 years and at the fag end of his career.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Correction of date of birth in service record
  • delay and laches
  • burden of proof
  • contemporaneous evidence
  • service jurisprudence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (12) 33

Writ Petition (St.) No. 99753 of 2020

2020-12-31

S. S. Shinde, Abhay Ahuja

Mr. Sagar Kasar for petitioner; Abhijeet A. Joshi a/w Varsha Sawant for respondents 1 to 3; Shri A. A. Alaspurkar for respondent-State

Prabhakar Yashwant Salve

The Chief Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking correction of date of birth in service record and restraining retirement.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents to allow his proposal dated 03/04/2020 and correct his date of birth to 12/03/1966 and superannuation date to 31/03/2024, and to restrain respondents from retiring him on 31/12/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's date of birth was recorded as 12/12/1962 in service record based on school leaving certificate; he claimed actual date of birth is 12/03/1966 as per birth certificate and sought correction after 30 years of service.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to correction of date of birth in service record after a delay of nearly 30 years. Whether the petitioner has produced sufficient contemporaneous evidence to support his claim.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his actual date of birth is 12/03/1966 as per birth certificate and that the school leaving certificate was erroneous. Respondents argued that the date of birth was recorded based on the school leaving certificate submitted at the time of entry and that the claim is highly belated.

Ratio Decidendi

Correction of date of birth in service record cannot be claimed at the fag end of service without contemporaneous evidence and explanation for delay; the employer is entitled to rely on documents submitted at the time of entry.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. This Petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs: ... Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition (St.) No. 99753 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court. The petition was heard on 29/12/2020 and judgment pronounced on 31/12/2020.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Record — Belated Claim After 30 Years of Service Not Entertained. Petitioner sought correction of date of birth from 12/12/1962 to 12/03/1966 but failed to explain dela...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.