Search Results for "re-development agreement"

517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MBRRB Notices and Order in Bhendi Bazar Redevelopment Project. Court upholds validity of notices under Section 95A of MHAD Act and order appointing SBUT as developer, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by occupants of Sardharia Building in Bhendi Bazar, Mumbai, challenging actions of the Bombay Building ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts.

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petitions Against Slum Rehabilitation Permissions — Earlier Appeals Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Dismissed. Developer Contends Petitioners Lack Locus Standi as Only Minority of Society Members Objected.

The case involved two writ petitions filed by certain members of registered co-operative housing societies, namely Hanuman Hitwardhak SRA CHS Ltd., Ek...