Search Results for "Infrastructure"

2259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against ITAT's Interpretation of Infrastructure Fee Entitlement; Assessee Contends for Allowance of 5% of Gross Advertising Bills Under Agreement. Interpretation of Clause-3 of Agreement Raises Substantial Question of Law Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal arose from an assessment order for Assessment Year 1993-94 concerning the deduction claimed by the assessee, M/s. Star Time Communication (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.

The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.

The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows L&T's Challenge to Tender Rejection by MMRDA, Directs Fresh Evaluation of Technical Bids. The court set aside the rejection of technical bid for Package 1 as arbitrary and directed expeditious evaluation for Package 2.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T) against the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Directions for Improvement of Healthcare Facilities in Government Hospitals in Goa in Public Interest Litigation. Court Holds That Right to Health is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21 of the Constitution and State Has a Legal Obligation to Provide Basic Medical Facilities.

This public interest litigation was filed by Prakash B. Sardessai and Vishwesh Sardessai, residents of Goa, seeking improvement of healthcare faciliti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Technical Qualification of Consortium in Tender for Conversion of MODU to MOPU. Court upholds ONGC's decision to treat consortium as technically qualified, finding no arbitrariness or mala fides in the tendering process.

The petitioners, Afcons Infrastructure Limited and others, challenged the decision of Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) to treat a consortium ...