Bombay High Court Issues Directions for Improvement of Healthcare Facilities in Government Hospitals in Goa in Public Interest Litigation. Court Holds That Right to Health is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21 of the Constitution and State Has a Legal Obligation to Provide Basic Medical Facilities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This public interest litigation was filed by Prakash B. Sardessai and Vishwesh Sardessai, residents of Goa, seeking improvement of healthcare facilities at government hospitals, clinics, and dispensaries in the State of Goa. The petitioners highlighted deficiencies in infrastructure, shortage of doctors and staff, lack of essential medicines and equipment, and poor maintenance of government health institutions. The court, recognizing the importance of health as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, appointed a Commissioner to inspect the facilities. The Commissioner's report confirmed several deficiencies. The court heard arguments from the petitioners' amicus curiae and the Advocate General for the State. The court analyzed the report and held that the State has a legal obligation to provide basic medical facilities. It issued comprehensive directions to the State government to address the deficiencies, including filling vacancies, ensuring availability of medicines and equipment, and improving infrastructure. The court disposed of the petition with directions for compliance and monitoring.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Health - Fundamental Right - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - The court considered whether the State has fulfilled its obligation to provide basic medical facilities in government hospitals. The court held that the right to health is a fundamental right under Article 21 and the State must ensure adequate infrastructure, doctors, and equipment. (Paras 1-8)

B) Public Interest Litigation - Healthcare Facilities - Government Hospitals - The petition raised issues regarding deficiencies in healthcare facilities in Goa. The court appointed a Commissioner to inspect hospitals and submitted a report highlighting deficiencies. The court issued directions to the State to rectify the deficiencies. (Paras 9-79)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the healthcare facilities at government hospitals, clinics and dispensaries in the State of Goa are adequate and whether the State has fulfilled its constitutional obligation to provide basic medical facilities to citizens.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court issued comprehensive directions to the State of Goa to improve healthcare facilities, including filling vacancies, ensuring availability of medicines and equipment, and improving infrastructure. The petition was disposed of with directions for compliance and monitoring.

Law Points

  • Right to health is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution
  • State has a legal obligation to provide basic medical facilities
  • public interest litigation
  • healthcare infrastructure
  • government hospitals
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 186

Writ Petition No. 359 of 2007

2023-10-06

G. S. Kulkarni, Bharat P. Deshpande

2023:BHC-GOA:1744-DB

S.D. Lotlikar (Senior Advocate) with S. Keny (Amicus Curiae) for petitioners; D.J. Pangam (Advocate General) with Deep Shirodkar (Addl. Government Advocate) for respondent nos. 1 and 2

Prakash B. Sardessai and Vishwesh Sardessai

The Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Goa; The Director, Directorate of Health Services, Government of Goa; Goa Medical College & Hospital; Goa Medical Council; Medical Council of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation

Remedy Sought

Directions to the State of Goa to improve healthcare facilities in government hospitals, clinics, and dispensaries.

Filing Reason

Deficiencies in healthcare facilities at government hospitals in Goa, including lack of infrastructure, shortage of doctors and staff, and inadequate medicines and equipment.

Issues

Whether the State of Goa has fulfilled its constitutional obligation to provide basic medical facilities in government hospitals. What directions should be issued to ensure adequate healthcare infrastructure in Goa.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that government hospitals in Goa lack basic facilities, adequate doctors, staff, medicines, and equipment, violating the right to health under Article 21. Respondents (State) argued that steps are being taken to improve facilities and that the petition is based on outdated information.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to health is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the State has a legal obligation to provide basic medical facilities in government hospitals. Any deficiency in this regard directly affects the fundamental rights of citizens.

Judgment Excerpts

"It is health which is real wealth, and not pieces of gold and silver." The Court observed that citizens have a legal and constitutional right to have basic medical facilities.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2007 as a public interest litigation. The court appointed a Commissioner to inspect government hospitals in Goa. After receiving the Commissioner's report and affidavits from the parties, the court heard arguments and delivered judgment on October 6, 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Sandalwood Confiscation Case — High Court Order Restored. Confiscation under Section 61A(2) of Kerala Forest Act, 1961 invalid as no forest offence proved; landowners entitled to benefit of Government Order d...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without ...