Search Results for "certiorari jurisdiction"

1955 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1955 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BCCI's Five-Year Ban on Cricketer for Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Proceedings Set Aside as Petitioner Denied Fair Hearing and Cross-Examination Rights Under BCCI Anti-Corruption Code.

The petitioner, Hiken Naresh Shah, a professional cricketer who had played 37 first-class matches, challenged the order of the Board of Control for Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Articles of Charges Against KSRTC Employees for Lack of Power to Lay Traps Under Security Standing Orders. The court held that the Security Standing Orders do not authorize the laying of traps, rendering the disciplinary proceedings without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Taking Cognizance Against Additional Advocate General in Private Complaint for Offences Under SC/ST Act and IPC — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of PC Act

The petitioner, Sri K M Nataraj, the Additional Advocate General of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Individual Workmen's Complaints for Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Dismissed Complaints Holding Recognised Union Had Exclusive Right to File Such Complaints, and High Court Finds Need for Factual Adjudication on Merits.

The writ petitions arose from a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Pune, dated 13-3-1996, which dismissed 63 workmen's complaints seeking perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal Order in CRPF Disciplinary Proceedings Due to High Court's Excessive Judicial Review. Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness, Not Merits or Evidence Re-evaluation, Under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) following departmental proceedings. The co...