Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Bombay Writ Petition Filed Against Union of India and State of Maharashtra Concerning Scheduled Tribes Classification. The Petition Included Applications by Tribal Organizations Seeking Intervention, but the Extract Does Not Disclose the Final Verdict or Legal Issue.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-11-11 08:54:30
  • 129
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 4919 OF 2017

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 218

Writ Petition No. 4919 of 2017 with Civil Application Nos. 864, 865 and 812 of 2019

2024-02-16

2024:BHC-AS:13094-DB

Maharani Ahilyadevi Samaj Prabodhan Manch Maharashtra Rajya Mumbai, Murarji Arjun Panchpol-Dhangar, Dr Jagannath Prasad Baghel-Dhangar

The Union of India, The Chairperson National Commissions for Scheduled Tribes, The Secretary Ministry of Law & Justice, The Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, The State of Maharashtra, The Principal Secretary Tribal Development Department, The Chairman Maharashtra State Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Commission, The Commissioner Tribal Research & Training Institute

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2017 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. In 2019, Civil Application Nos. 864, 865 and 812 of 2019 were filed seeking intervention by Adivasi Samaj Kruti Samiti, Tribal Rights Protection Committee, and Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram respectively.

Acts & Sections

  • Public Trusts Act, 1950:
  • Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950:
  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ Petition Scheduled Tribes Public Trusts Act Civil Application

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Application for Indemnity under Crop Insurance Scheme Due to Previous Ruling. Court Upheld Earlier Decision Excluding Loans Disbursed Before 1st April 1985 from Compensation under the Comprehensive Crop Insurance Scheme. 2026-11-13 12:22:18
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Medical Negligence Case for Fresh Consideration Due to Evidence Issues. The National Commission's Order Set Aside for Overlooking Critical Findings of the State Commission. 2026-11-13 12:22:17
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition murder Acquittal natural justice compensation Jurisdiction Land Acquisition burden of proof limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petition Against Tribunal's Order for Appointment of Exc...

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Enforcement Directorate Actions in Multiple Writ Petitions...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?