Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1591 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1591 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Claim of Idling Establishment Due to Prohibition Clause in Contract. Clause 17.3 of General Conditions of Contract Bars Compensation for Delay, Only Extension of Time Permissible.

The Union of India, through the General Manager, Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Upholds Solatium and Interest Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court affirms that land owners are entitled to solatium and statutory interest based on binding Supreme Court precedent.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Section 34 Arbitration Petition — Delay in Filing Amendment Not Fatal as Amendment Only Clarified Existing Grounds Without Causing Prejudice.

The petitioner, Inox Leisure Limited, challenged an order dated 07/09/2013 passed by the Principal District Judge, Panaji, which allowed an amendment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against MSME Facilitation Council Award on Maintainability Grounds. Council Has Jurisdiction Over Disputes Arising Before 2006 Act Came Into Effect.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an award of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (respondent no. 4) in a writ petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Apar Industries Ltd., a major supplier of Over Head Equipment to the Indian Railways, challenged a blacklisting order passed by the Ra...