Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Power Developer in Mega Power Policy Customs Duty Exemption Dispute — Press Release Not a Binding Policy Change. The court held that a Press Release reducing the capacity threshold for Mega Power Projects from 1000 MW to 700 MW did not create a binding right to customs duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appellant had assumed the risk of policy changes under the RFP.

20 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 30.06.2014, which dismissed the appeal of Nabha Power Limited...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Green Belt Classification of Jayamahal Palace Hotel in Revised Master Plan 2015. The court held that the BDA's notification classifying the property as green belt was valid and not ultra vires, as the petitioners failed to establish any vested right or arbitrariness in the zoning decision.

15 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal representatives of the late H.H. Jyotendra Sinhji Vikramsinhji, owned properties bearing numbers 1, 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Premium Floor Area Ratio Scheme and Rejects Challenges Under Articles 14, 21, 243ZE, and 300A of Constitution. Section 18-B of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and Section 38-D of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Held Not Violative of Constitution, and All Impugned Notifications Sustained.

15 Jun 2026

The matter concerns a batch of cases challenging the constitutional validity of statutory provisions introducing the Premium Floor Area Ratio (FAR) sc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Failure to Provide Personal Hearing to Objectors Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid. The Court held that the right to a personal hearing under Section 5A is mandatory and its denial violates natural justice, leading to quashing of the acquisition.

8 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Abuli Abdul Husain Vora and Nafisa Abuli Abdul Husain Vora, owned land in Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli. The Union Territory of Da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

25 Jun 2026

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)