Search Results for "Municipal Corporation Resolution"

1487 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1487 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Sand Ghat Allotments in Re-auction Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of allotment without notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, five proprietors of firms, were allotted sand ghats through an auction process. However, the respondents issued a re-auction notice o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Retail Outlet Dealership Selection by Indian Oil Corporation — No Arbitrariness Found in Selection Process. Petitioner Failed to Establish Violation of Selection Criteria Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Anita Sidram Koli, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 (Indian Oil Corpora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Land Grant Fraud Case. Petitioners Argue Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations and Trial Court Erred in Ordering Investigation.

Three criminal petitions were filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by accused Nos. 2 to 4 in PCR No.30/2012 seeking to quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...