High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted to M/s Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd for a large group housing project in Betqui-Candola village, Goa. The property, survey No.33/1, was originally in an orchard zone. In 2001, the previous owner obtained conversion of 1,28,000 square metres to settlement zone and provisional NOC for subdivision. The developer purchased the property in September 2007 and applied for conversion sanad in December 2008, seeking change of land use for about 1,27,120 square metres. The Town and Country Planning Department recommended conversion of 1,09,120 square metres, deducting areas on steep slopes. The Village Panchayat forwarded the application in 2010, and after multiple resubmissions and policy decisions on FAR, technical clearance was granted on 18 November 2011. The developer obtained conversion sanad from the Collector on 23 April 2013 for 1,02,387 square metres. A construction license was issued by the Panchayat on 15 May 2012. The petitioner society, upon learning the project magnitude from a website advertisement in February 2013, complained of illegalities, including lack of conversion sanad before NOC and license issued by Sarpanch instead of Secretary. They also objected to environmental clearance and consent to establish. After representations went unheeded, they filed an earlier PIL (No.3 of 2014) where the court directed the authorities to hear the petitioners before sanctioning revised plans. The Chief Town Planner heard them and granted revised technical clearance on 20 March 2015, and the Panchayat issued a fresh construction license on 27 November 2015. In the present PIL, the petitioners challenged the conversion sanad, technical clearance, and construction license, and sought restoration of the land. The court issued rule in 2017 and maintained status quo. At final hearing, the court examined the statutory framework under the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Act, 2008 and regulations, and addressed the developer’s challenge to petitioners’ bonafides. The court rejected the bonafides challenge, noting the society was formed to protect the area and had previously been entertained. The judgment, reserved on 11 July 2018, was pronounced on 27 September 2018, though the remaining portion of the judgment detailing the decision is not available in the provided text.

Headnote

A) Statutory Framework - Land Development and Building Construction - Goa (Regulation of Land Development and Building Construction) Act, 2008 and Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010 - Section 8 of Act, Regulation 2(11) of Regulations - Court outlined the statutory scheme under which all land development and construction in Goa must be carried out in accordance with the Act and Regulations, and referred to definitions such as 'access' (Paras 16-17).

B) Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability and Bonafides - Where a society is formed by residents specifically to challenge a development project that threatens their area, the timing of formation does not render the litigation malafide; earlier PIL entertained shows good faith (Paras 15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Validity of permissions granted for a group housing project, including the conversion Sanad dated 23 April 2013, technical clearance dated 20 March 2015, and construction license dated 27 November 2015, and whether a detailed study of contours and gradient is needed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Land development and construction in Goa must be as per the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Act
  • 2008 and Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations
  • 2010
  • Conversion Sanad and technical clearance require proper scrutiny under the Act
  • Public interest litigants need to show bonafides
  • Timely formation of a society to protect local interests is not malafide
  • Compliance with environmental clearance is mandatory for projects of certain size
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (09) 84

PILWP No.14 of 2016

2018-09-27

N. M. Jamdar, Prithviraj K. Chavan

Nigel Da Costa Frias, Maria Correia, S. D. Lotlikar, Anthony D'Silva, Sagar Dhargalkar, P. Dangui, Deep Shirodkar

Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee

M/s Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd., The Village Panchayat of Betqui-Candola, The State of Goa, The Additional Collector-II, The Town Planner, The Chief Town Planner, The Goa SEIAA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging permissions for a group housing project.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek restoration of the property to its original condition, setting aside of permissions, and a direction for detailed study of contours and gradient.

Filing Reason

Alleged illegalities in grant of conversion sanad, technical clearance, and construction license, and environmental concerns regarding water, waste, and hill cutting.

Previous Decisions

Earlier PIL (No.3 of 2014) disposed with directions to hear petitioners before sanctioning revised plans; Chief Town Planner heard them and granted revised technical clearance; status quo ordered in present petition on 27 September 2017.

Issues

Whether the conversion Sanad dated 23 April 2013 was legally granted. Whether the technical clearance dated 20 March 2015 and construction license dated 27 November 2015 are valid. Whether the project requires a detailed study of contours and gradient. Whether the permissions were granted in violation of the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010.

Judgment Excerpts

It was decided that all the applications received up to 23 November 2010, shall be processed as per the earlier policy that is FAR being 80 irrespective of the plot size. The construction licence was granted pursuant to a resolution by the Panchayat in the meeting held on 10 April 2012. The Court recorded that there is no work going on at site, and ordered that status quo will continue till further orders.

Procedural History

In 2001, the previous owner obtained conversion of 1,28,000 sq.m. from orchard to settlement zone and provisional NOC for subdivision. In 2007, the developer purchased the property. In 2008, the developer applied for conversion sanad. Between 2009-2011, the Town and Country Planning Department processed the application, and on 18 November 2011, technical clearance was issued. On 23 April 2013, the conversion sanad was granted. The construction license was issued on 15 May 2012. After the petitioner society formed and complained, an earlier PIL was filed in 2014, leading to court directions for hearing. Revised technical clearance was issued on 20 March 2015, and a fresh construction license on 27 November 2015. The present PIL was filed in 2016; rule was issued on 27 September 2017 with status quo. Final hearing took place, and judgment was reserved on 11 July 2018 and pronounced on 27 September 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa (Regulation of Land Development and Building Construction) Act, 2008: Section 8
  • Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010: Regulation 2(11)
  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Seeking Salary for Assistant Teacher in Ashram School Due to Disputed Facts. Mandamus cannot be issued when appointment was on honorarium basis and approval not granted.