High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Land Grant Fraud Case. Petitioners Argue Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations and Trial Court Erred in Ordering Investigation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Three criminal petitions were filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by accused Nos. 2 to 4 in PCR No.30/2012 seeking to quash the complaint and the FIR registered as Crime No.57/2012 by the Lokayukta Police. The first respondent, an ex-councillor and alleged trustee, filed a complaint alleging that the first accused (the Peethadhipathi of Adichunchanagiri Mahasamsthana Mutt) colluded with the petitioners and numerous public servants to fraudulently transfer government-granted land originally allotted to Sri Ramalingeshwara Swamy Temple Trust. The complaint alleged that the land was transferred using fabricated documents without proper government sanction and used for unauthorized purposes. The petitioners contended that the complaint lacked specific allegations regarding their individual involvement, was mala fide, and filed to harass them and tarnish their reputation. They argued that the Trial Court failed to apply its mind to whether the complaint disclosed any cognizable offence before directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC. The High Court heard the matter and reserved orders on 02.07.2021, pronouncing its order on 02.08.2021.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Trial Court erred in directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC without specific allegations against the petitioners and without application of mind?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (08) 27

Criminal Petition No. 4133/2012 c/w Criminal Petition No. 4134/2012 and Criminal Petition No. 4135/2012

2021-08-02

H.P. Sandesh

G. Krishna Murthy, Bhavana G.K., M.R. Vijay, Venkatesh S. Arabatti, B.S. Prasad

Sri Purushothamanandanatha Swamiji, Sri Prakashnatha Swamiji, Dr. Sunil Babu

C. Lakshminarayana, State by Lokayukta Police

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash complaint and FIR

Remedy Sought

Quash the complaint and all proceedings in PCR No.30/2012 and FIR in Crime No.57/2012

Filing Reason

The complaint is malafide, lacks specific allegations against the petitioners, and the Trial Court did not apply its mind before ordering investigation.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court referred the complaint for investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC leading to registration of FIR

Issues

Whether the Trial Court erred in directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC without specific allegations against the petitioners and without proper application of mind?

Submissions/Arguments

The complaint does not disclose the nature of involvement of each petitioner. The complaint is totally motivated and malafide filed to sully the petitioners' image and harass them. The Trial Court did not apply its mind to whether the complaint discloses any cognizable offence before directing investigation. The complainant falsely claims to be a trustee.

Judgment Excerpts

The main contention of the petitioners in all these petitions is that the nature of involvement of each of the petitioner have not been disclosed in the complaint and the very complaint is totally motivated and malafide complaint filed with the sole objective of sullying the image and reputation of the petitioner herein and to harass and wreck vengeance against the petitioner to coerce him into terms.

Procedural History

The first respondent/complainant filed a complaint before the XXIII Additional City Civil and Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Bengaluru, registered as PCR No.30/2012. The learned Judge referred the matter for investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., leading to registration of FIR in Crime No.57/2012 by the Lokayukta Police. The petitioners, being accused Nos.2 to 4, filed criminal petitions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash the complaint and FIR. The High Court heard the petitions and reserved orders on 02.07.2021, pronouncing its order on 02.08.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482, Section 156(3)
  • Karnataka Land Revenue Act:
  • Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act: Section 321(1), Section 321(2)
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Land Grant Fraud Case. Petitioners Argue Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations and Trial Court Erred in Ordering Investigation.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Co-Accused's Petition Challenging Pardon to Approver in Murder Case — No Right of Hearing Under Section 306 CrPC. Co-accused cannot claim right of audience before tender of pardon as it is a matter between prosecution an...