Search Results for "block development officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "block development officer"

1271 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1271 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Oct 2024

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

21 Jun 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-2013 Passed in Various Writ Petitions.

21 Apr 2014

...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)