Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-04 09:21:14
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010256712014_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (10) 7

RFA NO. 969 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) c/w RFA NO. 912 OF 2015, RFA NO. 342 OF 2022, RFA NO. 343 OF 2022, RFA CROB. NO. 21 OF 2024

2024-10-01

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

T.M. Venkata Reddy, Ravi H.K, Pradeep J.S, G.S. Kannur, D.P. Mahesh, Harishith B.S, Kiran, Srinivasa, others as per cause list

Jayarama (Deceased by LRs Rukmini, Shashikala, Ramamurthy, Ramachandra, Ramgopal, Sunil), Doddabayanna, Chikkabayanna (RFA 969/2014); C. Ramakrishna (RFA 912/2015); Rajendra G (RFA 342/2022); and others in RFA 343/2022

Smt. Munirathnamma and others (legal heirs of Hanumantharaya Setty) and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular first appeals filed by defendants against decree in suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought declaration of title and permanent injunction against defendants; defendants are appealing the decree.

Previous Decisions

Suit O.S.No.6045/1989 was decreed by VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore on 8.4.2014 in favor of plaintiffs, granting declaration and permanent injunction.

Procedural History

Original suit O.S.No.6045/1989 filed before VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, decreed on 8.4.2014. Regular first appeals filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Appeals numbered RFA 969/2014, RFA 912/2015, RFA 342/2022, RFA 343/2022, and cross-objection RFA CROB 21/2024. Heard by High Court of Karnataka on 1.10.2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order XLI Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Regular First Appeal Declaration Permanent Injunction Civil Procedure Property Dispute

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Incomplete, Benefit of Doubt Given Under Section 302 IPC. 2026-11-04 11:51:54
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Truck Driver Established. Deceased's Income as Mason in Gulf Countries Assessed at Rs.10,000 per Month with 30% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 15... 2026-11-04 11:51:48
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder acquittal natural justice compensation burden of proof land acquisition Jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Expunges Adverse Remarks Against Police Officer in Preventive Detention Case...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Abuse of Process...

Supreme Court Allows Recruitment Appeal in Police Constable Case Due to Flawed Medical Ass...

Lost Your Password?