HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-09-13 00:32:35

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010256712014_1

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (10) 7

RFA NO. 969 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) c/w RFA NO. 912 OF 2015, RFA NO. 342 OF 2022, RFA NO. 343 OF 2022, RFA CROB. NO. 21 OF 2024

2024-10-01

SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

T.M. Venkata Reddy, Ravi H.K, Pradeep J.S, G.S. Kannur, D.P. Mahesh, Harishith B.S, Kiran, Srinivasa, others as per cause list

Jayarama (Deceased by LRs Rukmini, Shashikala, Ramamurthy, Ramachandra, Ramgopal, Sunil), Doddabayanna, Chikkabayanna (RFA 969/2014); C. Ramakrishna (RFA 912/2015); Rajendra G (RFA 342/2022); and others in RFA 343/2022

Smt. Munirathnamma and others (legal heirs of Hanumantharaya Setty) and others

Nature of Litigation

Regular first appeals filed by defendants against decree in suit for declaration and permanent injunction.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought declaration of title and permanent injunction against defendants; defendants are appealing the decree.

Previous Decisions

Suit O.S.No.6045/1989 was decreed by VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore on 8.4.2014 in favor of plaintiffs, granting declaration and permanent injunction.

Procedural History

Original suit O.S.No.6045/1989 filed before VIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, decreed on 8.4.2014. Regular first appeals filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Appeals numbered RFA 969/2014, RFA 912/2015, RFA 342/2022, RFA 343/2022, and cross-objection RFA CROB 21/2024. Heard by High Court of Karnataka on 1.10.2024.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96, Order XLI Rule 1

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, N... 2026-09-20 10:30:53

High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitat... 2026-09-20 10:30:52

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Previous Decisions

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Dispute — Jurisdiction under Section 263 U...

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. The prosecut...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute Due to Lack of Consent. App...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...