Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-2013 Passed in Various Writ Petitions.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-01 12:12:43
  • 113
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010059922013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (04) 33

W.A.No.5828/2013 and connected matters

2014-04-21

D.H. Waghela, B.V. Nagarathna

O. Shivarama Bhat for appellants; A.S. Ponnanna, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State; P.S. Manjunath for MUDA

Sri M.N. Ramesh and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

The Single Judge passed an order dated 05-08-2013 in the writ petitions. The appellants filed the present writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 to set aside that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ appeal Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act Mysore Urban Development Authority single judge order urban development

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Attempted Rape Due to Sufficient Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC was upheld as the evidence indicated an attempt to commit rape. 2026-11-01 13:35:14
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Amendment to Counterclaim in Civil Suit. Counterclaim Based on Cause of Action Arising After Filing of Written Statement Is Not Maintainable Under Order VIII Rule 6A Code of Civil Procedu... 2026-11-01 13:35:14
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Murder natural justice acquittal Compensation burden of proof land acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?