Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-2013 Passed in Various Writ Petitions.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 19:07:59
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010059922013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (04) 33

W.A.No.5828/2013 and connected matters

2014-04-21

D.H. Waghela, B.V. Nagarathna

O. Shivarama Bhat for appellants; A.S. Ponnanna, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State; P.S. Manjunath for MUDA

Sri M.N. Ramesh and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

The Single Judge passed an order dated 05-08-2013 in the writ petitions. The appellants filed the present writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 to set aside that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ appeal Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act Mysore Urban Development Authority single judge order urban development

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Commercial Suit — Decree for Rs.4.25 Crores Granted on Alleged Admission in Claim for Rs.22.66 Crore 2026-08-02 19:07:59
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-... 2026-08-02 19:07:59
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof Benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?