Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-2013 Passed in Various Writ Petitions.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-28 04:44:09
  • 90
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010059922013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (04) 33

W.A.No.5828/2013 and connected matters

2014-04-21

D.H. Waghela, B.V. Nagarathna

O. Shivarama Bhat for appellants; A.S. Ponnanna, Addl. Govt. Advocate for State; P.S. Manjunath for MUDA

Sri M.N. Ramesh and Others

State of Karnataka and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Procedural History

The Single Judge passed an order dated 05-08-2013 in the writ petitions. The appellants filed the present writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 to set aside that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ appeal Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act Mysore Urban Development Authority single judge order urban development

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Considers Insurance Claim Repudiation Case — Hearing Concluded, Order Reserved. Insurer repudiated fire claim alleging violation of policy conditions and inconsistencies in insured's statements. 2026-09-16 21:35:11
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Under Section 115 CPC Due to Alternate Remedy Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Order rejecting plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC affects substantive rights and is revisable under Section 34(4) of the MRC Ac... 2026-09-16 21:35:07
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land Acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?