Search Results for "Registration Suspension"

492 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 492 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Star Zing Marks Protected. Use of identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' by Defendant restrained as deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered trademarks.

The Plaintiff, Sky Enterprise Private Ltd., filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademarks and passing off by the Defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Upholds Consumer Fora Orders for Compensation. Ownership of Vehicle Not Transferred Despite Sale Agreement; Insurer Liable to Pay Claim Amount with Interest.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Surendra Kumar Bhilawe against The New India Assurance Company Limited, setting aside the National Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...