Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Star Zing Marks Protected. Use of identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' by Defendant restrained as deceptively similar to Plaintiff's registered trademarks.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiff, Sky Enterprise Private Ltd., filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademarks and passing off by the Defendant, Abaad Masala & Co. The Plaintiff is engaged in the business of processing, manufacturing, and marketing masala powders, spices, and condiments. It is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'Star Zing' (label and word mark) and various other marks including 'White Chinese Pepper Masala', 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala', 'White Chinese Pepper Curry Powder', 'Black Chinese Curry Powder', 'White Chinese Masala', and 'Black Chinese Masala', all registered in Class 30 during 2016-2017. The Plaintiff claimed that these marks had acquired distinctiveness and goodwill through extensive use since 2012, when they were first used as part of 'Star Zing' labels. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant had adopted identical marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' for its masala products, which were deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks and likely to cause confusion. The Plaintiff sought an interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using these marks. The Defendant contended that the marks were descriptive and that the Plaintiff had no exclusive right over them, and that the Defendant had honestly adopted the marks. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, particularly Sections 28 and 29, and held that the Plaintiff's marks were registered and the Defendant's use of identical marks for identical goods constituted infringement under Section 29(2) and (3). The Court also found that the Plaintiff had established a strong prima facie case of passing off, as the marks had acquired secondary meaning and the Defendant's adoption was not honest. The balance of convenience was in favor of the Plaintiff, as the Defendant had not yet launched its products, and the Plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm. The Court granted an interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' or any deceptively similar marks.

Headnote

A) Trademark Law - Infringement - Registered Trademark - Sections 28, 29 Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Plaintiff's registered word marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' are infringed by Defendant's use of identical marks for identical goods - Held that the use of identical marks for identical goods constitutes infringement under Section 29(2) and (3) of the Act, and the Defendant's adoption is not honest or concurrent (Paras 5-10).

B) Trademark Law - Passing Off - Deceptive Similarity - Common Law - Plaintiff has established goodwill and reputation in the marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' through extensive use since 2012 - Defendant's use of identical marks is likely to cause confusion and deceive the public - Held that the Plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case for passing off (Paras 11-14).

C) Civil Procedure - Interim Injunction - Balance of Convenience - Sections 94, 95 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Balance of convenience lies in favour of the Plaintiff as the Defendant has not yet launched its products and the Plaintiff's established business would suffer irreparable harm - Held that an interim injunction is granted restraining the Defendant from using the impugned marks (Paras 15-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' or any deceptively similar marks in respect of masala powders and allied goods.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim application allowed. Defendant restrained from using the marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' or any deceptively similar marks in respect of masala powders and allied goods until disposal of the suit.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • Passing off
  • Interim injunction
  • Deceptive similarity
  • Registered trademark
  • Common law right
  • Goodwill and reputation
  • Balance of convenience
  • Irreparable loss
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 94

Interim Application No.01 of 2019 in Commercial I.P. Suit (L) No. 1124 of 2019

2020-01-08

S.C. Gupte, J.

2019:BHC-OS:376

Mr. Sanjeev Singh a/w Ms. Shivani Rakesh Bindra and Mr. Shailesh Rai i/b Ms. Shivaji Rakesh Bindra for Applicant/Plaintiff; Mr. Vinod Bhagat a/w Ms. Parveen Anand i/b G.S. Hegde & V. A. Bhagat for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Commercial IP suit for trademark infringement and passing off.

Remedy Sought

Interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using the marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' or any deceptively similar marks.

Filing Reason

Alleged infringement of Plaintiff's registered trademarks and passing off by Defendant's adoption of identical marks.

Issues

Whether the Plaintiff has a prima facie case for trademark infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Whether the Plaintiff has a prima facie case for passing off. Whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of granting an interim injunction.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff submitted that its marks 'White Chinese Pepper Masala' and 'Black Chinese Pepper Masala' are registered and have acquired distinctiveness and goodwill; Defendant's use of identical marks constitutes infringement and passing off. Defendant contended that the marks are descriptive and the Plaintiff has no exclusive right; Defendant's adoption was honest and concurrent.

Ratio Decidendi

Use of identical registered marks for identical goods constitutes infringement under Section 29(2) and (3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. A strong prima facie case of passing off is established when the plaintiff's marks have acquired secondary meaning and the defendant's adoption is not honest. Balance of convenience favors the plaintiff when the defendant has not yet launched its products and the plaintiff's established business would suffer irreparable harm.

Judgment Excerpts

The Plaintiff is a registered proprietor of the trademark ‘Star Zing’ (both as a label mark and a word mark), as also various other trademarks, with or without the words ‘Star Zing’, such as “White Chinese Pepper Curry Powder”, “White Chinese Pepper Seasoning”, “Black Chinese Pepper Curry Powder”, “Black Chinese Masala”, “White Chinese Pepper Masala”, “Black Chinese Pepper Masala” and “White Chinese Masala”, in Class 30. The use of identical marks for identical goods constitutes infringement under Section 29(2) and (3) of the Act. The Plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case for passing off.

Procedural History

The Plaintiff filed Commercial I.P. Suit (L) No. 1124 of 2019 alleging trademark infringement and passing off. The Plaintiff filed Interim Application No.01 of 2019 seeking an interim injunction. The application was heard and disposed of by oral judgment on 8 January 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 28, 29
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 94, 95
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Setting Aside Enhanced Penalty in Railway Disciplinary Case. Disproportionate Enhancement of Pension Cut from Three to Five Years Quashed Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Primary Teachers Without No Objection Certificate Under Rule 9 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967. Rule 9 held directory, not mandatory, and cannot be used to deny appointme...