Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

169 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Year-Round Operation of Procurement Centres for MSP. Court holds that procurement operations are policy decisions based on seasonal harvest cycles and cannot be directed by courts under Article 226.

28 May 2025

The petitioner, Rait Sena Karnataka, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking Lease Cum Sale Deed for APMC Shop — Contractual Dispute Not Enforceable via Writ Jurisdiction. Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued to Compel Execution of Lease Cum Sale Deed as No Fundamental or Statutory Right Is Involved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

30 May 2019

The petitioner, C. Vijaykumar, a market functionary holding a valid licence, was allotted Shop No. B-24 in the APMC Yard, Davanagere, in the year 2000...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Rejection of Shop Allotment in APMC Yard. Endorsement Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice, Fresh Consideration Ordered.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Mohammed Shah Nawaz, proprietor of Shah Nawaz and Brothers, has been carrying on business as a licencee in the vegetable market at Kal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Recovery Order. Recovery of Excess Payment Without Imposing Penalty Not Appealable Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1967.

3 Aug 2016

The petitioner, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hinganghat, challenged an order dated 10-12-2008 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Service Matter, Holding Suspension Pending Enquiry Not a Punishment. The court restored the order of removal from service, setting aside the reinstatement ordered by the appellate authorities under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Rules, 1967.

4 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Agriculture Produce Market Committee, challenged the orders of the Divisional Joint Registrar and the Minister for Cooperation, Market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members Due to Availability of Alternative Statutory Remedy Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Nomination and Counting Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction and Directed Petitioners to Avail Election Petition Remedy.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioners, who were candidates in the election for members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kamptee, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Third Extension of APMC Board in Solapur — Holds Successive Extensions Without Election Unlawful Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The court directed the Collector to hold elections within four months, failing which an Administrator must be appointed.

15 May 2012

The petitioners, claiming to be members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Karmala, challenged an order dated 19 April 2012 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility to Contest APMC Election Despite Election Being Held, Holds That Deletion of Rule 88 Does Not Bar Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court set aside the order declaring respondent no.2 eligible to contest the election and directed rejection of his nomination papers, as the alternate remedy of election petition under Rule 88 of the APMC Rules was deleted.

23 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Sadashivrao Ganpatrao Mahajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagp...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)