Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Considers Insurance Claim Repudiation Case — Hearing Concluded, Order Reserved. Insurer repudiated fire claim alleging violation of policy conditions and inconsistencies in insured's statements.

The complaint was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission by a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing besan and chana dal....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reconsiders Promoter's Right to Additional Construction Under MOFA After Supreme Court Remand. Dispute Centers on Whether Section 7A Overrides Flat Purchasers' Consent Requirement for Additional Wings in an Existing Scheme.

The Bombay High Court heard two first appeals remanded by the Supreme Court in a dispute between Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society (the society) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Challenging Restoration of Suit in Property Dispute — Plaint Not Barred by Res Judicata or Specific Relief Act. New Cause of Action Arising from Assignment of Lease Justifies Fresh Declaratory Suit Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a long-standing property dispute over a plot of land in Naigaon, Dadar, Mumbai. The original lessee, Goswami Maharaj, granted a 999-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdictional Ruling in Distributor Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Not Extended by Conduct Despite Continued Commercial Dealings Post-Expiry of Two-Year Term.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37(2)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Raymond Limited against an order of the lea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Damages. Court fees are not payable on a tentative claim at the initial stage when the exact valuation is to be adjudicated later, as per Section 7(i) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the respondent, a retired government officer and advocate, against the State of Punjab and its officers for rec...