Search Results for "service tax recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1190 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1190 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Directors' Challenge to Pre-deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Penalty Case — Rule 13(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 Does Not Permit Personal Penalty on Directors. The court set aside the CESTAT order directing pre-deposit of 25% penalty by directors, holding that Rule 13(1) only contemplates penalty on the person availing credit.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioners, Mr. Ashokkumar H. Fulwadhya and Mr. Daulatkumar H. Fulwadhya, directors of M/s. Harisons Steel Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Customs Appeal in Vessel Confiscation Case — Reduces Fine from Rs.1 Crore to Rs.5 Lakh Upheld as Not Perverse. Court holds that reduction of fine for confiscated vessel and setting aside of fine for mixed diesel are based on evidence and not arbitrary under Customs Act, 1962.

3 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the order dated 5 August 2008 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat for Non-Compliance with Section 145(1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Illegal.

27 Jan 2011

The petitioners, three elected members of Gram Panchayat Morane, challenged the order dated 15th October 2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

6 Jul 2011

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Car Parking License Dispute. Clause 15 of License Agreement Permitted Change of Location Without Compensation, and No Evidence of Loss Was Found.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Garuda Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., was granted a license by the Airport Authority of India (AAI) to operate a car parking facility at...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Public Servants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

5 Mar 2018

The case involves two appeals against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Kashinath Vikramji Thorat (accused No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State of Goa's Claim for Port Services as Admiralty Claim Against Vessel Sale Proceeds. Port Authority's Services to Vessel in Distress Constitute Maritime Claim with Priority Over Other Claims.

7 Jun 2018

The plaintiff, State of Goa through Captain of Ports, filed an admiralty suit claiming recovery of Rs. 1,31,60,000/- for services rendered to the vess...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Commissioner of Customs in CHA Licence Cancellation Case — Failure to Verify Importer's Identity Under Regulation 14(d) of CHALR, 1984 Justifies Cancellation. The Court held that the CESTAT erred in setting aside the cancellation on the ground of leniency and that the CHA's obligation to verify the importer's identity is mandatory.

31 Oct 2018

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, against an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribuna...

99 100 101 102 103

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)