Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat for Non-Compliance with Section 145(1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, three elected members of Gram Panchayat Morane, challenged the order dated 15th October 2010 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, directing dissolution of the Gram Panchayat under Section 145 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The petitioners were elected in 2007, and petitioner no.1 was the Sarpanch elected against a post reserved for O.B.C. (woman). A no-confidence motion was moved against her by 12 members, which failed on 7th July 2009. Immediately thereafter, 11 members tendered their resignations, leaving only the three petitioners and one other member. The Chief Executive Officer submitted a report dated 26th November 2009, and based on that, the Divisional Commissioner passed the dissolution order. The petitioners contended that no show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was given to them before passing the order, violating principles of natural justice and the mandatory requirements of Section 145(1) of the Act. The respondents argued that the order was justified as the Gram Panchayat had lost quorum due to resignations. The court examined Section 145(1) and found that it explicitly requires the Divisional Commissioner to issue a show cause notice and give an opportunity of hearing to the members before ordering dissolution. Since this was not done, the order was illegal and unsustainable. The court allowed the petition, quashed the dissolution order, and directed the respondents to proceed in accordance with law, if so advised. The status quo order was vacated.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners challenged dissolution order passed by Divisional Commissioner under Section 145 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Court held that failure to issue show cause notice and grant hearing vitiates the order - Petition allowed and dissolution order quashed (Paras 1-6).

B) Local Self-Government - Dissolution of Gram Panchayat - Section 145 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Requirement of show cause notice and opportunity of hearing - Court held that Section 145(1) mandates a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing before dissolution - Non-compliance renders order illegal - Order quashed (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of dissolution of Gram Panchayat under Section 145 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 is valid when no show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Impugned order dated 15th October 2010 passed by respondent no.2 is quashed and set aside. Respondents are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law, if so advised. Status quo order vacated.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
  • Section 145 Bombay Village Panchayats Act
  • 1958
  • Dissolution of Gram Panchayat
  • Resignation of members
  • Quorum
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (01) 19

Writ Petition No. 10200 of 2010

2011-01-27

B.P. Dharmadhikari

Mr. V.D. Hon holding for Mr. A.S. Sawant for petitioners, Mrs. V.A. Shinde A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1,2,4,5, Mr. M.S. Kulkarni for caveator, Mr. D.S. Bagul for respondent no.3, Mr. S.P. Shah for respondent no.6

Ujwala Anil Thakare, Hirabai Yuvraj Thakare, Sunita Namdeo Wagh

State of Maharashtra, Divisional Commissioner Nashik, Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Dhule, Collector Dhule, Addl. Collector Dhule, Bapu S/o Narayan Khairnar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging dissolution order of Gram Panchayat.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 15th October 2010 dissolving Gram Panchayat Morane.

Filing Reason

Dissolution order passed without show cause notice or opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

Status quo order dated 27.10.2010 by this Court.

Issues

Whether the dissolution order under Section 145 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 is valid without show cause notice and opportunity of hearing.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: No show cause notice or opportunity of hearing was given before passing dissolution order, violating Section 145(1) and principles of natural justice. Respondents: Dissolution was justified as Gram Panchayat lost quorum due to resignations.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 145(1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 mandates issuance of show cause notice and opportunity of hearing before dissolution of Gram Panchayat. Non-compliance renders the order illegal and unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 145(1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 requires the Divisional Commissioner to issue a show cause notice and give an opportunity of hearing to the members before ordering dissolution. The impugned order does not mention any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing having been given to the petitioners.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 10200 of 2010 on 27.10.2010 challenging dissolution order dated 15.10.2010. Court granted status quo on 27.10.2010. Heard finally on 27.01.2011 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958: Section 145
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat for Non-Compliance with Section 145(1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 — Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Illegal.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Zilla Parishad Employee for Procedural Violation. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to conduct a proper inquiry under Rule 4(iv) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District Services (Discipline...