Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Development Right Certificate (DRC) by the Mira Bhyandar Municipal Corporation (Respondent No.2) in favour of M/s. Ravi Developments (Respondent No.4). The petitioner claimed that the DRC dated 28 August 2015 was issued contrary to the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act, causing huge loss to the public exchequer. He sought directions for civil, criminal, and service law action against the Municipal Commissioner (Respondent No.3). The court, comprising Chief Justice Dr. Manjula Chellur and Justice G.S. Kulkarni, heard the matter. The respondents, represented by counsel, argued that the DRC was issued in accordance with the Development Control Regulations and the MRTP Act. The court examined the submissions and the record. It held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or loss to the public exchequer. The court found that the DRC was validly issued and dismissed the petition, observing that the PIL was not maintainable as the petitioner had no personal interest and the challenge was without merit.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability - Challenge to Development Right Certificate - The petitioner, a resident and tax payer, filed PIL alleging illegal issuance of DRC causing loss to public exchequer - Court examined the challenge on merits and found no illegality - Held that the petition was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal interest (Paras 1-2).

B) Municipal Law - Development Right Certificate - Validity - Issuance of DRC dated 28 August 2015 by Municipal Commissioner in favour of developer under MRTP Act - Court held that the DRC was issued in accordance with the Development Control Regulations and no loss was caused to the public exchequer - Held that the petition was devoid of merits (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the issuance of Development Right Certificate (DRC) by the Municipal Corporation in favour of the developer was illegal and caused loss to the public exchequer.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Development Right Certificate
  • MRTP Act
  • Loss to Public Exchequer
  • Municipal Corporation Powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 51

Public Interest Litigation No. 15 of 2016

2017-03-08

Dr. Manjula Chellur, C.J., G. S. Kulkarni, J.

Mr. Tushar N. Sonawane for Petitioner, Mrs. M.P. Thakur for Respondent No.1, Mr. M.S. Lagu for Respondent Nos.2 and 3, Mr. Rajiv Narula i/b. M/s. Jhangiyani Narula & Associates for Respondent No.4

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging issuance of Development Right Certificate

Remedy Sought

Writ of Mandamus directing State to take action against Municipal Commissioner and Writ of Certiorari to quash DRC

Filing Reason

Alleged illegal issuance of DRC causing loss to public exchequer

Issues

Whether the issuance of Development Right Certificate was illegal and caused loss to public exchequer

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that DRC was issued contrary to MRTP Act causing loss to public exchequer Respondents argued that DRC was issued in accordance with law

Ratio Decidendi

The issuance of Development Right Certificate was in accordance with the Development Control Regulations and MRTP Act, and no loss was caused to the public exchequer. The PIL was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this Public Interest Litigation is to the action of Respondent No.2 Municipal Corporation in issuing Development Right Certificate (for short 'DRC') in favour of Respondent No.4 who is a developer, on the ground that issuance of such certificate has caused huge loss to the public exchequer.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Release of Land from Development Plan Due to Lapse Under Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Court Orders Consideration of Representation Treating 2008 Detailed Development Plan as Lapsed if No Acqu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.