Search Results for "Excess pay recovery"

1102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Suit for Recovery of Unpaid Amounts and Interest in Construction Contract Dispute. Holds that Delayed Payments Attract Interest Under Section 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and Excess Recovery from Mobilisation Advance Must Be Refunded.

The plaintiff, M/s Ajay Deep Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the Maharashtra State Police Housing & Welfare Corporation Ltd. for recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Excess Recovery in Income Tax Stay Matter — Petitioner Voluntarily Paid 20% Demand, Revenue Adjusted Refund Beyond Permitted Limit. Adjustment of Refund Against Stayed Demand Violates Instruction No.1914 and Stay Order Dated 17 April 2024.

The petitioner, an individual, filed his return of income for assessment year 2015-2016 on 28 September 2015, declaring income of Rs.56,65,660/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Bank to Unblock Family Pension Account of Widow Due to Absence of Fault and Violation of Natural Justice. Recovery of excess pension cannot be unilateral and must follow due process of law; blocking of entire account without notice causes hardship to pensioner.

The petitioner, a 62-year-old widow, received family pension following the death of her husband, a Second Division Assistant who died in harness in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Statutory Corporation Seeking Recovery of Compensation from Landowners After Acquisition Lapse. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 11 Award Does Not Create Debt Obligation; Remedy Lies in Civil Court.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, a statutory corporation established under the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Developme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Teacher for Not Passing MSCIT Exam in Time. Recovery from retirement benefits set aside as petitioner had given undertaking but recovery was held impermissible under principles of natural justice and proportionality.

The petitioner, Smt. Shaheen Fatima Mohsin Ahmed, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 1st January 1986 and superannuated on 31st January 2024. Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Pay Refixation. Repatriated Employee Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Enjoyed in Ex-Cadre Post, Refixation Set Aside.

The Union of India and railway authorities (petitioners) challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's 2011 Pay Scale Order, Settles Long-Standing Litigation. Court Affirms Doctrine of Merger, Ensures Fair Compensation for Retired Employees, and Provides Finality to Pay Discrepancy Dispute

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a protracted litigation involving the State of Uttar Pradesh and its employees regarding the implementation of ...