Gujarat High Court Disposes Writ Petition as Infructuous After Pension and Gratuity Paid During Pendency — Liberty Granted to Challenge Excess Loan Deduction. Principal Relief of Payment of Pension and Gratuity Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Became Infructuous as Amounts Were Paid on 23.05.2022.

High Court: Gujarat High Court
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sitaben Ambalal Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court seeking release of pension, gratuity, commuted pension, and other consequential benefits with 12% interest from 30.09.2021. During the pendency of the petition, the respondent authorities paid the gratuity and pension amounts on 23.05.2022, as confirmed by the Additional Treasury Officer (Pension), Ahmedabad. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, Ms. Forum Shah, submitted a calculation sheet which was taken on record. The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Bhuvnesh Gahlot, conceded that the principal relief had been granted but raised a grievance regarding excess deductions made towards loan payment interest. He sought liberty to challenge such deductions separately. The court granted the permission, allowing the petitioner to file an appropriate petition challenging the alleged excess recovery. Consequently, the court held that the principal prayer in the petition did not survive and disposed of the petition as infructuous, reserving liberty for the petitioner to pursue the ancillary claim.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Disposal of Petition - Petition seeking release of pension and gratuity becomes infructuous when the amounts are paid during pendency - Court disposed of the petition as not surviving, reserving liberty to challenge excess loan deduction separately (Paras 4-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition survives when the principal relief of payment of pension and gratuity has been granted during pendency

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the petition as infructuous in respect of the principal relief, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition challenging the alleged excess recovery of loan interest.

Law Points

  • Writ petition under Article 226 becomes infructuous when principal relief is granted during pendency
  • Liberty to file fresh proceedings for ancillary claims
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (03) 907

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4279 of 2022

2026-03-20

MAULIK J. SHELAT

2026:GUJHC:20932

MR NK MAJMUDAR, MR BHUVNESH GAHLOT, MS FORUM SHAH

Sitaben Ambalal Chauhan

State of Gujarat & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking release of pension, gratuity, and other consequential benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the action of respondent authorities in not releasing pension, gratuity, and other benefits, and direction to pay the same with 12% interest from 30.09.2021.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of pension, gratuity, and other consequential benefits by the respondent authorities.

Issues

Whether the petition survives when the principal relief of payment of pension and gratuity has been granted during pendency.

Submissions/Arguments

Respondent submitted that the principal relief has been granted as pension and gratuity were paid on 23.05.2022. Petitioner conceded the payment but raised grievance about excess deduction towards loan interest and sought liberty to challenge it.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ petition under Article 226 becomes infructuous when the principal relief sought is granted during the pendency of the petition. However, the court may reserve liberty to the petitioner to pursue ancillary claims separately.

Judgment Excerpts

At the outset, Ms. Shah, learned AGP, would submit that so far as the prayer made in this petition would not survive, as during the pendency of this petition, the amount of gratuity and pension have been paid to the petitioner on 23.05.2022. The permission as sought for is granted. It is open for the petitioner to file an appropriate petition challenging the alleged excess recovery of loan interest by the respondent.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 4279 of 2022 before the Gujarat High Court. During pendency, the respondent paid gratuity and pension on 23.05.2022. The court heard the matter on 20.03.2026 and disposed of the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals by University and Colleges in Assistant Professor Recruitment Dispute — UGC Regulation 10 Applicable for Awarding Marks for Teaching Experience Under Table 3A.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Non-Compliance with 2013 Act — Mandamus Issued for Fresh Award Under Section 26. Land Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under 1894 Act but Award Passed After 2013 Act Came into Force Must C...