Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions by Judicial Officers Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Payments. Petitions Seek to Quash Show Cause Notices Issued by District Authorities and Refund of Amounts Already Recovered.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WP NO. 8955 OF 2026,WP NO. 8964 OF 2026 and WP No. 8977 OF 2026

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 141

WP No. 8955 of 2026, WP No. 8964 of 2026, WP No. 8977 of 2026

2026-07-09

S. M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar

2026:MHC:2904

Ms. Sujith As, Mr. S. Giridharan, Mr. T. Ravikumar

R.Deepa, K.Rajesh, S.Lakshmi Devi

The Registrar General, High Court of Judicature at Madras; The Principal Secretary to Government, Home (Court V) Department; The Principal Accountant General (A and E); The District Judge, The Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam; The District Treasury, Udhagamandalam; The Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gudalur; The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udhagamandalam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Manual Scavenging Death Case Under Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. Court Holds Private Employer Liable f...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Closure Compensation Case — Clarifies Rights of Badli Workmen. The court upheld the entitlement of regular employees to closure compensation under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, while denying cla...