Search Results for "Article 253"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Habeas Corpus Petition Examines Legality of Judicial Custody Where Remand Was Not Extended by Competent MCOC Special Court; Accused in Telgi Stamp Scam Seek Release After Non‑Extension of Judicial Remand Under Section 309(2) CrPC by a Judge Not Appointed Under MCOC Act.

The petitioners, five accused in the Telgi stamp scam (Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the MCOC Court at Pune), filed this writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Koyna Project-Affected Persons Seeking Rehabilitation Land — Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Set Aside. State Directed to Allot Alternative Land Within Six Weeks as Petitioners' Eligibility Was Undisputed.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Waman Ganpatrao Kadam, owned lands in Velhe, Satara, acquired for the Koyna Project in 1961. They claimed they receive...