Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Shipping Income Tax Case — Income from Operation of Ships in International Waters Not Taxable in India Under Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA. The court held that the assessee, a Singapore tax resident, is not liable to tax in India on income from shipping operations as the DTAA allocates taxing rights to Singapore.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had deleted an addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as income from shipping operations of the assessee, APL Co. Pte. Ltd., a company tax resident of Singapore. The assessee was engaged in the business of owning and operating ships in international waters, particularly container ships. The AO had treated the income as taxable in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the ITAT held that the income was exempt under Article 8 of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), which provides that profits from the operation of ships in international waters are taxable only in the country of residence of the enterprise. The Revenue appealed to the Bombay High Court. The court considered the provisions of the DTAA and the Income Tax Act, and held that the DTAA overrides the domestic law. Since the assessee was a tax resident of Singapore and did not have a Permanent Establishment in India, the income from shipping operations was taxable only in Singapore. The court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the ITAT's order.

Headnote

A) Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement - Shipping Income - Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA - Income from operation of ships in international waters - The assessee, a Singapore tax resident, derived income from owning and operating container ships in international waters. The Revenue sought to tax this income in India, but the court held that under Article 8 of the DTAA, such income is taxable only in the country of residence of the enterprise, i.e., Singapore. The court also noted that the assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment in India. (Paras 1-11)

B) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 9 - Scope of Total Income - The court examined whether the income could be taxed under the Act, but concluded that the DTAA overrides the domestic law, and since Article 8 of the DTAA allocates taxing rights to Singapore, the income is not taxable in India. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the income of the assessee, a tax resident of Singapore, from the operation of ships in international waters is taxable in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, or is exempt under Article 8 of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals dismissed. The court held that the income of the assessee from operation of ships in international waters is not taxable in India under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA. The ITAT's order deleting the addition is affirmed.

Law Points

  • Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement
  • Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA
  • Shipping Income
  • Permanent Establishment
  • Tax Residency
  • Income Tax Act
  • 1961
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 99

Income Tax Appeal (IT) No. 429 of 2018 with Income Tax Appeal (IT) No. 744 of 2018

2023-08-30

K. R. Shriram, Dr. N. K. Gokhale

2023:BHC-OS:9304-DB

Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for Appellant, Ms Arati Vissanji i/by Mr. Atul K Jasani for Respondent

The Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-1, Mumbai

APL Co. Pte. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Revenue against ITAT order deleting addition of income from shipping operations.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to tax income of assessee from shipping operations in India.

Filing Reason

Assessee, a Singapore tax resident, was engaged in owning and operating ships in international waters. Assessing Officer added Rs. 1,50,00,000 as income taxable in India, which was deleted by ITAT.

Previous Decisions

ITAT deleted the addition, holding income exempt under Article 8 of India-Singapore DTAA.

Issues

Whether income from operation of ships in international waters by a Singapore tax resident is taxable in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, or exempt under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA.

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that the income is taxable in India under the Income Tax Act. Assessee contended that under Article 8 of the DTAA, income from shipping operations is taxable only in Singapore.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA, profits from the operation of ships in international waters are taxable only in the country of residence of the enterprise. Since the assessee is a tax resident of Singapore and does not have a Permanent Establishment in India, the income is not taxable in India. The DTAA overrides the domestic law of the Income Tax Act.

Judgment Excerpts

Assessee-Respondent was a tax resident of Singapore. It was engaged in the business of owning and operation of ships in international waters and in particular container ships. The court held that the income from shipping operations is taxable only in Singapore under Article 8 of the DTAA.

Procedural History

Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000 as income from shipping operations. ITAT deleted the addition. Revenue appealed to Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Sections 5, 9
  • India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA): Article 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Club's Appeal Against ESI Interest Demand — Interest Under Section 39(5)(a) of ESI Act, 1948 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Waived. Voluntary Coverage and Deposit of Principal Without Prejudice Do Not Extinguish Statutory In...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses State's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Regularization of Daily Wage Workers. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that non-regularization of workers employed for years constitutes unfair ...