Search Results for "procedural autonomy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "procedural autonomy"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considered Extension of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Chenab Bridge Project Dispute. The Court Analyzed Objections Regarding Tribunal's Procedural Decisions and Delay While Examining Whether to Extend the Mandate of the Standing Arbitral Tribunal Until December 31, 2026.

9 Jun 2025

The dispute arose from a contract dated November 24, 2004 for the design and construction of a special rail bridge across the river Chenab on the Katr...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers legality of State interference in recruitment by an autonomous technical institute. The dispute centers on the scope of autonomy under Government Resolutions and the power of the Board of Governors to make appointments without State oversight.

28 Feb 2019

The College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP), established in 1854, is a premier technical institute. In 2002, under the Technical Education Quality Improve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Autonomy of Engineering College and State's Power to Nullify Appointments. Multiple Writ Petitions Challenge Order Terminating 54 Lecturers at College of Engineering, Pune under TEQIP Autonomy.

28 Feb 2019

The case involved three writ petitions before the Bombay High Court concerning the autonomy of the College of Engineering, Pune (CoEP) and the State G...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.

1 Jan 1970

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Independent Arbitrator in Perkins Eastman v. HSCC Dispute — Clause 24 Arbitration Mechanism Invalid Due to Lack of Impartiality. The Court held that a person ineligible to act as arbitrator cannot appoint an arbitrator, relying on TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Limited.

29 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court considered an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the App...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Question of Excepted Clauses in Government Contracts to Larger Bench — High Court Erred in Relying on Bharat Drilling Without Analyzing Contractual Clauses. The issue of whether prohibitory claim clauses bind the Arbitral Tribunal requires authoritative determination by a larger bench.

5 Dec 2025

The State of Jharkhand appealed against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which allowed a Section 37 appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Over Distributorship Agreement. The Court affirmed that Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, applies to ensure arbitrator neutrality, overriding prior arbitration clauses that designate potentially biased arbitrators, such as a party's Chairman.

9 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a distributorship agreement dated March 31, 2015, between Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited (the petitioner) and ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)