Search Results for "development plan rejection"

506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State's Refusal to Modify Development Plan Reservation. State's Discretion to Revert Land to Original Reservation Upheld Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tukaram Mohite (since deceased through legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landowners' Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Change Master Plan Road Alignment. Change of Alignment of 30-Meter Road Not Permissible in Interregnum Under Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961; Decision of Planning Authority Upheld.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by two landowners, K. Gopalagowda and R. Ravichandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Development Plan Reservation — Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Landowners Entitled to Develop Lands as Acquisition Not Completed Within Ten Years.

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Survey Nos. 103 and 104 at Kopargaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Buildings Constructed with Valid Permissions Despite Proposed Road Alignment. Planning Authority Cannot Withhold Occupation Certificate Based on Unproposed Road Not Part of Development Plan Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Vedant Estate & Properties, constructed four buildings after obtaining all requisite permissions including permission under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...