Search Results for "Railway Construction Contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway Construction Contract"

485 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 485 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Railway Tender — Interpretation of 'Present Contract Value' Found Arbitrary and Irrational. The court held that the expression 'present contract value' in Clause 2.2.2.1(ii) of the RFP means the value of the present contract (Rs.696 crores) and not the qualifying contract value, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's technical bid.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking under the Ministry of Railways, challenged the rejection of its technical...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination Notice in Railway Tender Dispute — Breach of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Contractual Pre-Conditions. Termination set aside as Railway failed to follow mandatory contractual procedure of issuing show cause notice and considering contractor's explanation before terminating the contract.

17 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s DRN Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, was awarded a contract by the South Western Rail...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petition Challenges Tribunal's Findings on Payment for Additional Work, Restricted Quantities, and Extension of Time Under General Conditions of Contract.

24 Jun 2025

The dispute arose from a railway construction contract between Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway (Railways) and PLR HC RBR JV...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Rejects Challenge Based on Excepted Matters and Delay in Raising Counterclaim. The court found no ground to interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Arbitral Tribunal had considered the contractual provisions and extensions granted by consent.

14 Jan 2011

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 16 December 2005 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition for Termination of Standing Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Appointment of New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 11(6), 14(2), and 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Alleging Lack of Independence of Serving Railway Officer Arbitrators.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ITD Cementation India Ltd., a company engaged in construction and infrastructure, was awarded a contract by the respondent, Konkan Rai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Joint Venture Challenging Disqualification in Metro Rail Tender — Holds That Experience Criteria Must Be Interpreted Reasonably and Cumulatively for Joint Ventures. The court quashed the disqualification of M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture by Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited for not meeting clause 4.2(a) experience criteria individually, directing consideration of combined experience.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture, a joint venture between a Chinese state-owned enterprise and TATA Projects Limited, submitted a tender for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(iii) Bars Compensation for Delay. Contractor's Claims for Under-Utilisation of Labour, Overhead Charges, and Loss of Profits Rejected Due to Express Contractual Prohibition.

10 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Bombay Railways Engineering Co. against the General Manager, Central Railway, arising from a challenge to an arbit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Limitation of Liability Clause in Arbitration Case — Clause 49.5 Bars Damages for Employer Delay. Contractual prohibition on claiming damages for employer-caused delay held valid and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from a construction contract between M/s. C & C Constructions Ltd. (appellant) and IRCON International Ltd. (respondent) for buildin...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Extra Overhead Expenses in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(3) Bars Damages for Delay. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's award of compensation for delay was contrary to the express terms of the contract and the mutual shortclosure agreement.

21 Jan 2011

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 20th February 2007 passed by an Arbitral Tribunal in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)