Search Results for "MahaRERA execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MahaRERA execution"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Time-Bound Disposal of MahaRERA Execution Application and Examines Hybrid Hearing Guidelines. The Court Emphasized Access to Justice and Procedural Fairness Requiring Parties' Choice of Hearing Mode in Writ Petition Under Article 226.

24 Jul 2025

The writ petition was filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a homebuyer challenging delays and procedur...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Dismissal of Execution Application in Real Estate Regulation Case and Records Misrepresentation by Developer Before Coordinate Bench. Petitioners, as purchasers, sought execution of a RERA order directing handover of possession of three units, but the civil court dismissed the execution application as not maintainable; the court also noted that the developer had obtained interim protection from a coordinate bench by suppressing that the execution application had already been dismissed.

14 Jul 2025

Background — The dispute arose from agreements for purchase of three office units A-3010, A-3020, and A-3130 in a project by respondent no.1 develop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against RERA Orders on Pre-2017 Agreements, Upholding Retrospective Application of MahaRERA. Court holds that Section 3(1) of RERA applies to ongoing projects even if agreements were executed before the Act came into force.

11 Sep 2020

The judgment concerns three connected second appeals filed before the Bombay High Court under the Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The appeals were filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in RERA Interest Case for Delayed Possession. Builder directed to pay interest at SBI MCLR plus 2% from 1 January 2018 till possession for delay in handing over flats in slum rehabilitation project.

14 Mar 2024

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Era Realtors Private Limited (Appellant) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis.

26 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

8 Jun 2026

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)