Search Results for "wrongful ITC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "wrongful ITC"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

High Court

Writ Petition challenging Show Cause Notice for input tax credit reversal due to non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 caused by GST portal functionality issues.

8 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed the show cause notice issued to Tikona Infinet Private Limited, which alleged wrongful availing of ITC due to non-electr...

High Court

Madras High Court Sets Aside GST ITC Denial Order for Lack of Proper Inquiry into Genuineness of Supply. Remands Matter for Reconsideration with Opportunity to Produce Additional Documents.

5 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Akal Trade Links, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri R. Sangar Ganesh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines blocking of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A of CGST Rules. Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenge orders blocking electronic credit ledger without hearing, contending violation of natural justice and fundamental rights.

27 Jul 2023

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, by several pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment Application by ITC in Copyright and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Claims Not Frivolous or Vexatious, Require Trial. The court held that the test for summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC is stringent and that triable issues existed regarding copyright subsistence and passing off.

11 Jan 2022

The present Interim Application was filed by the Defendant, Indian Tobacco Company (ITC), seeking dismissal of the Plaintiff's claims for copyright in...

High Court

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

25 Feb 2026

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

17 Jun 2019

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Petition Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for Quashing of FIR in Alleged Extortion. Court Considers Whether FIR Discloses Cognizable Offence Under Section 384 IPC When No Ingredients Alleged.

8 Sep 2021

The petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner of Police in the CCB, filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash FIR No.64/2020 registered ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)