High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Against Company for Input Tax Credit Recovery — Jurisdiction Lacked Due to Portal Issues.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 471
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued to the petitioner, Tikona Infinet Private Limited, regarding the recovery of Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs. 18,30,58,995. The petitioner challenged the notice on the grounds that the necessary GST ITC-02 form was not filed electronically due to the non-functionality of the department's portal, which was admitted by the respondents. The petitioner had availed the ITC correctly during the period from September 2017 to November 2017, but the form could only be filed manually as the electronic option was unavailable. After several years, the notice was issued alleging wrongful availment of ITC based solely on the manual filing of the form. The court noted that the only basis for the notice was the failure to file electronically, despite the admitted issues with the portal. The court emphasized that the law does not compel compliance with impossible requirements and that the petitioner had complied with the filing requirements to the best of its ability under the circumstances. The court quashed the show cause notice, directing the respondents to consider the manually filed forms and to not deny ITC benefits solely based on the method of filing. The ruling reinforced the principle that procedural requirements should not be strictly enforced when compliance is rendered impossible by the department's own actions.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Input Tax Credit - Jurisdiction for Recovery - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Section 18(3) - The issuance of a show cause notice for recovery of ITC was quashed as the department's portal was not functional for electronic filing, rendering the notice arbitrary and beyond jurisdiction. The court held that the petitioner could not be penalized for non-compliance with electronic filing when it was impossible to do so (Paras 25-41).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the issuance of the show cause notice for recovery of Input Tax Credit was justified given the non-functionality of the electronic filing portal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the show cause notice dated 17 August 2023, directing the respondents to consider the manually filed forms and not deny ITC benefits based solely on the method of filing.

Law Points

  • Input Tax Credit
  • Jurisdiction
  • Manual Filing
  • Electronic Filing
  • Arbitrariness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 83

WP No. 16258 of 2023

2024-10-08

M.S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

Mr. Prasad Paranjape, Advocate Bhavya Varma, Mr. J B Mishra, Mr. Ram Ochani

Tikona Infinet Private Limited

Union of India, Commissioner (In situ), CGST & Central Excise

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to a show cause notice for recovery of Input Tax Credit.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the show cause notice dated 17 August 2023.

Filing Reason

The notice was issued due to alleged non-filing of GST ITC-02 electronically.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner had previously faced similar issues in other jurisdictions, leading to favorable rulings.

Issues

Whether the show cause notice was justified given the non-functionality of the electronic filing portal. Whether the petitioner could be penalized for manual filing due to departmental portal issues.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the show cause notice was arbitrary as the electronic filing was impossible. The respondents contended that the notice was intra vires and the petitioner could raise defenses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the law does not compel compliance with impossible requirements and that the issuance of the show cause notice was arbitrary given the admitted non-functionality of the electronic filing portal.

Judgment Excerpts

The issuance of such a show cause notice once it was admitted that either TDN or the Petitioner couldn't file Form GST ITC-02 on the department’s common portal amounts to the issuance of a show cause notice in excess of the jurisdiction vested in the second Respondent under the CGST Act and the Rules made thereunder. The law does not compel a person to do something she cannot possibly perform or something impossible. The issuance of the impugned show cause notice, given the admitted facts and circumstances, is an exercise in arbitrariness.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued after several years regarding the recovery of ITC, citing issues with the electronic filing portal.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 18(3)
  • Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017: Rule 41
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Law Case Regarding Inheritance Rights. The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to inherit the estate under the Bombay School of Hindu Law, as migration to the Banaras School was not proven.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order on Employment Exemption. The respondent's failure to appear for the written test and prolonged absence from duty negated any legal right to appointment under the applicable government order.