Search Results for "wildlife permission"

129 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Civil Application in PIL Challenging Order to Destroy Tigress Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Permission to Hunt Man-Eater Tigress Upheld as Chief Wildlife Warden’s Satisfaction Was Based on Relevant Material Without Overstepping Statutory Powers.

The petitioner, Dr. Jerryl Avinash Banait, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging an order dated 9.10.2017 passed by the Chief Wildlife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Mutt's Plea for Elephant Ownership Renewal and Translocation Subject to Welfare Compliance. Court Directs Joint Inspection of New Elephant Care Facility Before Renewal of Certificates Under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Tamil Nadu Captive Elephant Rules, 2011.

The petitioner, Sri Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham, a Hindu religious Mutt, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Construction in Pachmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary Due to Pending Stay on Exclusion. Applicant's land not finally excluded from sanctuary; High Court's interim stay on Collector's order prevents any commercial activity without Court permission.

The applicant, M/s Shewalkar Developers Limited, filed interlocutory applications seeking permission to construct a health/eco-resort on two plots (Pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Society Members in Wildlife Act Case — No Prior Sanction Obtained. Proceedings under Sections 9, 39, 44, 49B, 50, 51, 52 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 482 CrPC quashed for lack of mandatory sanction under Section 55 of the Act.

The applicants, who were members of Sindhu Education Society, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ch...