Search Results for "translation discrepancy"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Translated Documents in Known Language. Failure to Provide Marathi Translation of English Injury Certificate Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Yogesh Nandu Pujari, challenged a preventive detention order dated 25 January 2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Deputy Registrars Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Due to Mistaken Pay Rule Interpretation. Court holds that recovery of excess payments made without employee fault violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of equity.

The petitioners, eight former and current Deputy Registrars of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Registrar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Landlord failed to prove bonafide requirement and unlawful subletting under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, owners of a property in Thane, filed a suit for eviction of the respondents from a gala (shop) on grounds of default in rent, unlawfu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Secondary Evidence Application in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Directed to Permit Plaintiffs to Lead Evidence of Lost Agreement to Sell Upon Establishing Foundational Facts Under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the original plaintiffs against an order of the trial court rejecting t...