Search Results for "tiger attack"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Tiger Attack Victim Under Government Resolution - Petitioner, a Below Poverty Line Labourer, Entitled to Ex-Gratia for Injuries Sustained While Collecting Tur Seeds in Field Near Forest Area.

The petitioner, Kavita w/o Waman Kokode, a labourer residing in Wakal, Tahsil Sindewahi, District Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking compensati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wild Boar Attack Victim Under Government Resolution - Grievous Injury Certificate from Government Hospital Sufficient for Claim Under Government Resolution Dated 30.03.2013. Court Directs Forest Department to Pay Rs.1,00,000/- Compensation Within Four Weeks.

The petitioner, Uttam Sitaram Kose, a 70-year-old agriculturist, was attacked by a wild boar on 25.10.2015 while working in his field. He sustained in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Tiger Attack Victim Under Government Resolution on Man-Animal Conflict. Mental trauma from a sudden tiger attack constitutes 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, entitling the victim to Rs.1,00,000/- compensation.

The petitioner, Kavita Khobragade, a labourer from Waneri, Maharashtra, was attacked by a tiger and sustained multiple lacerated simple wounds on her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Suit Against Film 'Baaghi' — No Substantial Similarity Found Between Plaintiffs' and Defendants' Works. The court held that similarities were at the level of general ideas, not protectable expression under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Plaintiffs, XYZ Films LLC, PT Merantau Films, and Sikhya Entertainment Private Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against UTV Motion Pic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Crop Damage by Tigers in Agricultural Land - State Directed to Pay for Banana Plantation Loss. Forest Department's Recommendation for Compensation at Rs.48 per Plant Upheld; Finance Department's Refusal Based on No Policy Held Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Baburao Abaji Aglawe, a retired government servant, owned agricultural land in Seloo, Wardha, where he cultivated banana plants on 5 a...