Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wild Boar Attack Victim Under Government Resolution - Grievous Injury Certificate from Government Hospital Sufficient for Claim Under Government Resolution Dated 30.03.2013. Court Directs Forest Department to Pay Rs.1,00,000/- Compensation Within Four Weeks.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 306
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Uttam Sitaram Kose, a 70-year-old agriculturist, was attacked by a wild boar on 25.10.2015 while working in his field. He sustained injuries on the upper portion of his right elbow, right thigh, and chest. He was treated at Rural Hospital, Bramhapuri and discharged on 27.10.2015. The Medical Superintendent issued a certificate on 31.10.2015 stating the injuries were grievous. The petitioner claimed compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- under Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013. Although medical expenses were reimbursed, the compensation was denied by the Forest Department (Respondent No.4). The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court found the Forest Department's stand that the injury was not grievous to be unsustainable, given the government hospital's medical certificate. The court relied on the Division Bench decision in Baburao Abaji Aglawe v. State of Maharashtra (2012(3) ALL MR 646) which considered Section 39 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Wild Life Law - Compensation for Wild Animal Attack - Grievous Injury - Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013 - Petitioner attacked by wild boar while working in field, suffered grievous injuries as certified by Medical Officer of Government Rural Hospital - Forest Department denied compensation claiming injury not grievous - Court held that the Medical Officer's certificate is sufficient proof of grievous injury and compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- is payable under the Government Resolution - Held that the stand of the Forest Department is unsustainable (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for grievous injuries suffered due to attack by wild boar under Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013, despite the Forest Department's denial.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the petitioner within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Compensation for wild animal attack
  • Grievous injury certificate
  • Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013
  • Section 39 Wild Life (Protection) Act
  • 1972
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (12) 106

Writ Petition No. 4184 of 2017

2019-12-11

R. K. Deshpande, Milind N. Jadhav

Shri S.N. Gaikwad for Petitioner, Ms. T. Khan, AGP for Respondent nos. 1 to 4

Uttam Sitaram Kose

State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest; Principal Chief Conservator of Forest; Divisional Forest Officer, Bramhapuri Division; Range Forest Officer (Territory), North Bramhapuri Range

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compensation for injuries caused by wild animal attack.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- under Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013 for grievous injuries suffered due to wild boar attack.

Filing Reason

Denial of compensation by Forest Department despite medical certificate of grievous injury.

Previous Decisions

Medical expenses were reimbursed but compensation was denied.

Issues

Whether the petitioner suffered grievous injury as certified by the Medical Officer? Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation under Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he suffered grievous injury as per medical certificate and is entitled to compensation. Respondent Forest Department contended that the injury was not grievous.

Ratio Decidendi

A medical certificate issued by a Government Medical Officer certifying grievous injury is sufficient proof for claiming compensation under Government Resolution dated 30.03.2013 for injuries caused by wild animal attack. The Forest Department cannot deny compensation on the ground that the injury is not grievous when the government hospital has certified it as such.

Judgment Excerpts

We are unable to understand the stand taken by the respondent No.4 - the Forest Department that the petitioner has not suffered any grievous injury when the Medical Officer in the Rural Hospital of the Government has issued a certificate about the petitioner suffering from grievous injury. In the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in case of Baburao Abaji Aglawe vrs. State of Maharashtra and ors, reported in 2012(3) ALL MR 646, after considering the provision of Section 39 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972...

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 4184 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, after the Forest Department denied compensation for injuries suffered in a wild boar attack on 25.10.2015. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 11.12.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972: Section 39
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Collector's Requisition Orders in West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 Case Concerning Chandernagore Territory. Extension of West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 to Chandernagore by Chande...
Related Judgement
High Court WRIT PETITION No.7347 OF 2018