Bombay High Court Directs Compensation for Tiger Attack Victim Under Government Resolution on Man-Animal Conflict. Mental trauma from a sudden tiger attack constitutes 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, entitling the victim to Rs.1,00,000/- compensation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Kavita Khobragade, a labourer from Waneri, Maharashtra, was attacked by a tiger and sustained multiple lacerated simple wounds on her shoulder, arm, near axilla, and chest wall. She was admitted and treated at the General Hospital, Chandrapur for ten days. The medical certificate indicated no permanent deformity. The petitioner claimed compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for serious injuries under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, which provides compensation for man-animal conflict: Rs.5,00,000/- for death, Rs.4,00,000/- for permanent disability, and Rs.1,00,000/- for serious injuries. The respondents denied the claim, leading to the filing of a writ petition. The court considered the definition of 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution, noting it is not defined. The court reasoned that serious injury can be physical as well as mental, and the mental trauma from a terror-struck sudden tiger attack, though invisible, is more grievous and serious, especially when a person survives by narrow escape. The court held that such an attack is per se serious and grievous injury. Accordingly, the court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- in terms of the Government Resolution, to be decided within twelve weeks. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Compensation - Man-Animal Conflict - Serious Injury - Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016 - The petitioner suffered multiple lacerated wounds from a tiger attack and was hospitalized for ten days. The court held that 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution includes mental trauma and terror-struck sudden attack, which is per se serious and grievous, even if no permanent deformity results. The court directed the respondents to grant compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- within twelve weeks. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the injuries sustained by the petitioner due to a tiger attack constitute 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, entitling her to compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- in terms of the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016, to be decided within twelve weeks. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Serious injury includes mental trauma
  • Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016
  • Compensation for man-animal conflict
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (08) 176

Writ Petition No.4490 of 2017

2019-08-02

R.K. Deshpande, Vinay Joshi

Shri S.M. Bahirwar for the petitioner, Mrs H.N. Prabhu, AGP for the respondents

Kavita w/o Ramesh Khobragade

The Government of Maharashtra, Revenue and Forest Department; Range Forest Officer, Sindewahi; Round Forest Officer/Forester, Navargaon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a tiger attack under a government resolution on man-animal conflict.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for serious injuries caused by a tiger attack.

Filing Reason

The respondents denied the petitioner's claim for compensation for serious injuries under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016.

Issues

Whether the injuries sustained by the petitioner due to a tiger attack constitute 'serious injury' under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016.

Ratio Decidendi

Serious injury under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016 includes mental trauma and terror-struck sudden attack, which is per se serious and grievous, even if no permanent deformity results.

Judgment Excerpts

The mental injury or trauma as a result of 'Terror-struck sudden Tiger attack', though invisible, is more grievous and serious in nature, when a man survives by narrow escape. It is per se serious and grievous injury.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition after the respondents denied her claim for compensation for serious injuries under the Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 02.08.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Government Resolution dated 28.11.2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Mandamus for Survey and Demarcation of Land Based on Pending Application. The Court Directs Survey Within Twelve Weeks Considering Petitioner's Possession and Pending Civil Suit.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Specific Performance Case Upholding High Court's Decree Despite Absence of Formal Tender of Purchase Money. Vendor's Total Repudiation of Agreement for Reconveyance Made Formal Tender a Useless Formality,...