Search Results for "postal acknowledgment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "postal acknowledgment"

134 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Rent Default. Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over a Decade, No Dispute as to Standard Rent or Permitted Increases, Case Falls Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act.

24 Sep 2024

The dispute pertains to a suit for eviction filed by the landlady, Mrs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, against the tenant, Sudhir Kumar Sengupta (since decease...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in NI Act Case — Permits Complainant to Lead Further Evidence and Mark Xerox Copy of Postal Acknowledgment. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing applications under Section 311 CrPC and Section 63 Evidence Act, as the postal acknowledgment was crucial to prove service of legal notice under Section 138 NI Act.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner-complainant, Sri S Sudarshan, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Proced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — 'Not Claimed' Notice Constitutes Valid Service Under Section 138 Proviso (b). Refusal to accept notice by addressee amounts to deemed service; acquittal set aside.

19 Sep 2019

The appellant-complainant, Anil Gulabrao Khairkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Special Court for the Negotiable Instruments Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Want of Prosecution Due to Non-Service of Defendants — Court Holds That Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC Requires Willful Default or Negligence, Not Mere Failure to Serve. The court restored the suit, emphasizing that the plaintiffs had made efforts to serve the defendants and had filed a Chamber Summons for substituted service, which was pending.

29 Jan 2018

The appellants, M/s. Jain Developers and others, filed Suit No. 2808 of 2008 in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that there was a valid and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Cheating Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court finds that the investigating officer failed to examine crucial documents and witnesses, rendering the summary report premature and based on incomplete investigation.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dharmil Anil Bodani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Crim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice Service Valid Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act and Slum Act Permission Not Required at Decree Stage. The court held that statutory presumption under Section 27 of General Clauses Act applies to notice service and that Section 22 of Slum Act does not bar maintainability of suit filed before slum notification.

7 Aug 2015

The applicant, Indira Rani Ugrasen, filed Civil Revision Application No. 139 of 2007 in the Bombay High Court against the judgments and decrees dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Petitioner Failed to Prove Non-Service of Arbitral Award Sent by Registered Post.

12 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Jasvinder Kaur, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Section 138 N.I. Act — Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheques Were Issued as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence of Simple Imprisonment and Compensation.

3 Apr 2013

The applicant, Rekha Mahindra Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of three cheques totaling Rs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

10 Sep 2012

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation period for filing complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 runs from date of receipt of notice by accused, not from date of dispatch.

24 Feb 2010

The appellant, Krishnakumar Vishwanathprasad Chaturvedi, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)