Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation period for filing complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 runs from date of receipt of notice by accused, not from date of dispatch.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Krishnakumar Vishwanathprasad Chaturvedi, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Mrs. Rekha Dilip Thakur, alleging dishonour of a cheque. The Judicial Magistrate, FC, 23rd Court and Special Court (for trial of cases under Section 138 of the NI Act) dismissed the complaint solely on the ground that it was barred by limitation. The appellant challenged this dismissal in the Bombay High Court. The undisputed facts were that the legal notice was sent by the complainant on 10.9.2004, making a demand for money under the dishonoured cheque within fifteen days of receipt of notice. The postal acknowledgment filed on record as Document No. 7 showed that below the accused's signature, the accused had not put the date of receipt, but the postal stamp on the acknowledgment mentioned the date '14.9.04' as to the delivery thereof to the complainant. The accused in her statement recorded under Section 313 CrPC admitted receipt of the notice but claimed she did not remember the date. The trial court dismissed the complaint as barred by limitation, presumably computing limitation from the date of dispatch of notice. The High Court held that the limitation period for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act runs from the date of receipt of the notice by the accused, not from the date of dispatch. Since the postal acknowledgment showed delivery on 14.9.2004, the complaint filed on 15.10.2004 was within one month from that date and thus within limitation. The court set aside the dismissal and remanded the matter for fresh decision on merits.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Limitation - Section 138, 142(b) - Complaint dismissed as barred by limitation - Legal notice sent on 10.9.2004, postal acknowledgment shows delivery on 14.9.2004 - Complaint filed on 15.10.2004 - Held that limitation runs from date of receipt of notice by accused, not from date of dispatch - Since notice was received on 14.9.2004, complaint filed on 15.10.2004 is within one month from date of receipt - Dismissal set aside (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was barred by limitation when the legal notice was sent on 10.9.2004 and the complaint was filed on 15.10.2004, considering the date of receipt of notice by the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment and order dated 21.12.2005 set aside. Complaint restored to file for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law. Parties directed to appear before trial court on 22.3.2010.

Law Points

  • Limitation for filing complaint under Section 138 NI Act runs from date of receipt of notice by accused
  • date of receipt can be proved by postal acknowledgment or other evidence
  • complaint filed within one month of deemed receipt is within limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (02) 127

Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 2006

2010-02-24

A.P. Bhangale, J

Mr Mukund Papinwar for appellant, Mr I.S. Charlewar for respondent

Krishnakumar Vishwanathprasad Chaturvedi

The State of Maharashtra and Mrs Rekha Dilip Thakur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against dismissal of complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on ground of limitation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of dismissal order and restoration of complaint for trial on merits.

Filing Reason

Complaint under Section 138 NI Act was dismissed as barred by limitation.

Previous Decisions

Judicial Magistrate, FC, 23rd Court and Special Court dismissed complaint on 21.12.2005 solely on ground of limitation.

Issues

Whether the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was barred by limitation when the legal notice was sent on 10.9.2004 and the complaint was filed on 15.10.2004, considering the date of receipt of notice by the accused.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that limitation runs from date of receipt of notice by accused, which was 14.9.2004 as per postal stamp, and complaint filed on 15.10.2004 is within one month. Respondent argued that complaint was barred by limitation as notice was sent on 10.9.2004 and complaint filed after one month from that date.

Ratio Decidendi

The limitation period for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 runs from the date of receipt of the legal notice by the accused, not from the date of dispatch. The postal acknowledgment showing delivery on 14.9.2004 establishes receipt on that date, and the complaint filed on 15.10.2004 is within one month from that date and thus within limitation.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not disputed that legal notice was sent by complainant on 10.9.2004 making demand of money under dishonoured cheque within fifteen days of the receipt of notice. Postal acknowledgment filed on record as Document No. 7 shows that below her signature, accused has not put the date of receipt. Postal stamp on the acknowledgment mentions the date '14.9.04' as to the delivery thereof to complainant. Thus, the complaint filed on 15.10.2004 is within one month from the date of receipt of notice i.e. 14.9.2004.

Procedural History

Complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed by appellant against respondent. Judicial Magistrate, FC, 23rd Court and Special Court dismissed complaint on 21.12.2005 solely on ground of limitation. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 141 of 2006 in Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. High Court allowed appeal on 24.2.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138, 142(b)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation period for filing complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 runs from date of receipt of notice by...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation for Death of Minor Child in Motor Accident. Parents awarded Rs. 1,50,000 with interest under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for loss of dependency and consortium.