Search Results for "outward transportation"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Bunkers Arrest Case. Bunkers on board a ship can be arrested and sold separately under admiralty jurisdiction as they are not part of the ship.

The appellant, Mansel Limited, a Bermuda company engaged in chartering vessels, filed an admiralty suit seeking arrest of bunkers on board the vessel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows CENVAT Credit on GTA Service for Cement Manufacturer — Place of Removal Includes Buyer's Destination. Interpretation of 'Place of Removal' under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for outward transportation of goods sold on FOR destination basis.

The appellant, M/s. Madras Cements Limited, a manufacturer of cement, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Mid-Day Meal Scheme — No Right to Claim Contract Beyond Tender Conditions. Petitioner failed to comply with mandatory e-tender requirements and could not claim estoppel against government in contractual matters.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Madhyawarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Maryadit, a cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CENVAT Credit for Input Services Used for Storage Tanks Outside Factory in Central Excise Case — Services Used in Relation to Storage of Inputs Eligible for Credit Even if Received Outside Factory Premises.

The appellant, M/s. Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., is a manufacturer of excisable goods under Chapters 28, 29, and 31 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.

The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...