Search Results for "developer permission"

631 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 631 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Development Permission Despite Pending Criminal Case Against Different Property Developer. The court held that a criminal case concerning a different property cannot be a valid ground to refuse development permission for a separate land under a valid development agreement.

The petitioners, M/s. Gurudaya Builders, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Municipal Corporation (Respondent No. 3) to grant develo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Amenity Development Under Appendix 'W' of Thane Municipal Corporation Development Regulations. Petitioner entitled to Transferable Development Rights for developing amenity space on surrendered plot under Clause 6 of Appendix 'W'.

The petitioner, M/s. Cosmos Realtors Joint Venture, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MIDC to Resume Possession of Plots from Company in Liquidation for Non-Payment of Rent. Lease Termination Upheld Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Permission Granted Under Section 446 for Resumption of Possession.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed an application seeking permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...