Bombay High Court Allows MIDC to Resume Possession of Plots from Company in Liquidation for Non-Payment of Rent. Lease Termination Upheld Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Permission Granted Under Section 446 for Resumption of Possession.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed an application seeking permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No. A-2 and A-3 at Sangli Infotech Park, which were leased to Mantri Realty Limited (the respondent company, now in liquidation) under two agreements dated 27 August 2012 and 6 November 2013. The respondent company had made an application for plots in 2007, and MIDC issued an allotment letter on 27 January 2009. The company paid a land premium of Rs. 48,67,500 plus cost of approach of Rs. 9,32,207, totaling Rs. 57,99,707. The plots were allotted on 22 July 2009. Subsequently, the company failed to pay rent, leading MIDC to terminate the lease agreements. The company was wound up by order of this Court under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, in Company Petition No. 556 of 2015. MIDC filed the present application under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking permission to resume possession. The Official Liquidator had no objection to the application. The court considered the submissions and held that the lease was validly terminated, and MIDC was entitled to resume possession. The court granted permission to MIDC to resume legal and physical possession of the plots, subject to the condition that MIDC would pay the value of any improvements made by the company, as determined by the Official Liquidator, to the liquidation estate. The court also directed that the Official Liquidator would hand over possession to MIDC within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Lease Termination - Non-Payment of Rent - Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 - The applicant, MIDC, sought permission to resume possession of plots leased to a company in liquidation after termination of lease agreements due to non-payment of rent. The court held that the lease was validly terminated and the lessor was entitled to re-enter, and granted permission to resume possession subject to conditions. (Paras 1-10)

B) Company Law - Winding Up - Permission to Sue - Section 446 Companies Act, 1956 - The court considered the application under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, which requires leave of the Company Court for any suit or proceeding against a company in liquidation. The court granted such leave, allowing MIDC to resume possession. (Paras 1-10)

C) Company Law - Winding Up - Termination of Lease - Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted that the company was wound up under Section 433(e) on the ground of inability to pay debts. The termination of lease for non-payment of rent was a valid ground, and the Official Liquidator had no objection to the resumption of possession. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant (MIDC) is entitled to resume legal and physical possession of leased plots from a company in liquidation after termination of lease agreements for non-payment of rent, and whether such permission should be granted by the Company Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and granted permission to MIDC to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No. A-2 and A-3 at Sangli Infotech Park, subject to the condition that MIDC would pay the value of any improvements made by the company, as determined by the Official Liquidator, to the liquidation estate. The Official Liquidator was directed to hand over possession to MIDC within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Termination of lease for non-payment of rent
  • Permission to resume possession under winding up
  • Section 433(e) Companies Act
  • 1956
  • Section 446 Companies Act
  • Lessor's right to re-enter upon default
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (03) 74

Interim Application (L) No. 22487 of 2022 in Company Petition No. 556 of 2015

2024-03-12

Abhay Ahuja, J.

Ms. Shamali Gadre with Ms. Harshita Bhanushali i/b Little and Company for Applicant, Ms. Arpeeta Panvalkar for Official Liquidator

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Limited

Mantri Realty Limited (in liquidation)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application by lessor (MIDC) seeking permission to resume possession of leased plots from a company in liquidation after termination of lease agreements for non-payment of rent.

Remedy Sought

Permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No. A-2 and A-3 at Sangli Infotech Park.

Filing Reason

Termination of lease agreements due to non-payment of rent by the respondent company, which is now in liquidation.

Previous Decisions

The company was wound up by order of this Court under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, in Company Petition No. 556 of 2015.

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to resume possession of the leased plots after termination of lease agreements for non-payment of rent. Whether the Company Court should grant permission under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the lessor to resume possession from a company in liquidation.

Submissions/Arguments

Ms. Gadre, learned Counsel for the Applicant-MIDC, submitted that the respondent company failed to pay rent, leading to termination of lease agreements, and that MIDC is entitled to resume possession. The Official Liquidator had no objection to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

A lessor is entitled to resume possession of leased property from a company in liquidation upon valid termination of the lease for non-payment of rent, and the Company Court may grant permission under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, for such resumption, subject to payment for improvements to the liquidation estate.

Judgment Excerpts

This application has been filed by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (the 'MIDC'), established under the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, seeking permission of this Court to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No. A-2 and A-3 admeasuring 1848 sq. meters and 12059 sq. meters respectively at Sangli Infotech Park at Sangli (the 'said Plots') in view of the termination of Agreements to lease dated 27th August, 2012 and 6th November, 2013 respectively. Ms. Gadre, learned Counsel appears for the Applicant-MIDC and would submit that on 12th April, 2007, Mantri Reality Limited viz. the Respondent-Company (now in liquidation) made a formal application to the Applicant-Corporation requesting for plot(s) at the Sangli Infotech Park.

Procedural History

The respondent company was wound up by order of this Court under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, in Company Petition No. 556 of 2015. Thereafter, MIDC filed Interim Application (L) No. 22487 of 2022 seeking permission to resume possession of the leased plots. The application was heard and disposed of by this judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961:
  • Companies Act, 1956: Section 433(e), Section 446
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to State's Unjust Enrichment and Delay — Compensation Granted with Statutory Benefits Despite Laches. The State cannot evade its obligation to pay compensation for property taken without acqu...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Oppression Case Due to Absence of Continuing Oppression. Majority Shareholders' Resolution to Allot Shares to Outsiders Not Oppressive and Did Not Contravene Section 81 of Companies Act, 1956; Private Ag...