Search Results for "constitutional obligation"

1946 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1946 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Obligation of State Government to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases. Question of Whether Article 22(5) Mandates Separate Consideration by Government Before Referral to Advisory Board Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

The case involved writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Abdul Karim and Others against the State of West Bengal challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Deplorable Road Conditions and Pothole Deaths in Mumbai. Court Holds Right to Well-Maintained Roads as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 and Issues Mandatory Directions to Authorities.

This suo motu public interest litigation was registered by the Bombay High Court in 2013 based on a letter from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting the pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...