Bombay High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Deplorable Road Conditions and Pothole Deaths in Mumbai. Court Holds Right to Well-Maintained Roads as Fundamental Right Under Article 21 and Issues Mandatory Directions to Authorities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 92
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This suo motu public interest litigation was registered by the Bombay High Court in 2013 based on a letter from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting the pathetic condition of roads in Mumbai, potholes causing fatal and spinal injuries, and the inconvenience to citizens. The Court took cognizance and issued notices to various authorities including the State of Maharashtra, municipal corporations, MMRDA, MSRDC, and Mumbai Port Trust. Over the years, the Court passed several orders to address the issue, particularly during monsoons when potholes proliferated. On 20th May 2015, the Court issued a comprehensive set of interim directions binding all municipal corporations and other agencies. These directions mandated maintaining roads and footpaths in good condition, filling potholes scientifically, prominently displaying details of digging and repair works, establishing a multi-channel complaint mechanism (written, toll-free, website, text message) with tracking and uploading of action-taken reports, and giving wide publicity. Crucially, the Court declared that the right to have properly maintained streets is a fundamental right of citizens, and directed that circulars be issued warning officials that failure to maintain roads could lead to loss of life and disciplinary action. The Court also directed the State Government to consider extending these directions to all municipal corporations not party to the petition. The matter has been periodically monitored, with the Court noting that despite earlier orders, the deplorable condition of roads persists, causing deaths and injuries each monsoon. In the present order pronounced on 13th October 2025, the Court continued to exercise its jurisdiction, reiterating the earlier directions and emphasizing the need for compliance. The order underscores the continuing nature of the mandamus and the Court’s commitment to ensuring road safety as part of the fundamental right to life.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights - Right to Well-Maintained Roads - Constitution of India, Article 21 - The Court held that the right to have properly maintained streets is a fundamental right of citizens under Article 21, and failure by authorities to maintain roads in good condition can lead to loss of life, injuries, and waste of resources - Directions were issued to municipal corporations and agencies to maintain roads, footpaths, and bridges in proper condition, and to initiate disciplinary action against erring officials for non-compliance (Paras from the Order dated 20.05.2015, clauses (ii), (xiv)).

B) Municipal Law - Maintenance of Public Roads - Directions to Municipal Corporations and Agencies - No specific statute cited - All municipal corporations were directed to maintain streets/roads in good and proper condition, fill potholes scientifically, provide a four-mode complaint mechanism (written, toll-free, website, text), display details of digging works and repair timelines, and upload action taken reports with photographs within two weeks - Non-compliance may lead to disciplinary action (Paras from the Order dated 20.05.2015, clauses (ii)-(xiv)).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deplorable condition of roads and the resulting pothole-related deaths and injuries violate citizens' fundamental rights and what directions are necessary to ensure safe and properly maintained streets

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court continued to exercise its suo motu jurisdiction, reiterating earlier directions and emphasizing that the right to properly maintained streets is a fundamental right. It issued further monitoring directions and expected compliance from authorities. The matter remains ongoing.

Law Points

  • Right to have properly maintained streets is a fundamental right
  • Municipal corporations responsible to keep roads in good condition
  • Disciplinary action against officials for failure to maintain roads
  • Mechanism for citizen complaints mandatory
  • Scientific methods for road construction and repair
  • Accountability of authorities for road safety
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (10) 65

Public Interest Litigation No. 71 of 2013 along with Interim Application (Lodging) No. 29119 of 2025

2025-10-13

Revati Mohite Dere, Sandesh D. Patil

Mr. Jamshed Mistry, Ms. Ronita Bhattacharya Bector, Mr. Dipesh Siroya, Mr. Siddharth Ingle, Mr. Rashid Khan, Ms. Ruju Thakker, Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, M.M. Pabale, Mr. Anil Y. Sakhare, Mr. Joel Carlos, Ms. K.H. Mastakar, Ms. Oorja Dhond, Mr. Mandar Limaye, Mr. Prashant Chawan, Ms. Reshmarani Nathani, Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye, Mr. A. S. Rao, Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo, Ms. Neeta Patil, Mr. S.R. Nagolkar, Ms. Swati Sagvekar, Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge, Mr. Ajai Fernandes, Ms. Anjali Kotecha, Mr. Sandeep Mahadik, Mr. Shishankar D. Patil, Ms. Aparna Devkar, Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar, Mr. I.M. Khairdi, Mr. Ravindva S. Pachundkar, Mr. Gaurav Ugale, Mr. Vaishnav Brahmankar, Mr. Swapnil Mhatre, Mr. Shriram Kulkarni, Mr. Shailesh Chavan, Mr. Milind Deshmukh

High Court On Its Own Motion

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation regarding deplorable road conditions and pothole-related deaths and injuries

Remedy Sought

Effective maintenance of roads, filling of potholes, establishment of complaint mechanisms, and accountability of authorities

Filing Reason

Letter dated 24.07.2013 from Justice G.S. Patel highlighting pathetic road conditions and consequences including casualties

Previous Decisions

Several orders passed since 2015; detailed interim directions issued on 20.05.2015; continued monitoring each monsoon

Issues

Whether the deplorable condition of roads and potholes leading to deaths violates citizens' fundamental right to life and what measures are necessary to ensure safe roads

Ratio Decidendi

Right to have properly maintained streets is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution; municipal corporations and authorities are duty-bound to maintain roads in good condition, fill potholes scientifically, provide citizen complaint mechanisms, and take disciplinary action against erring officials; failure to comply leads to continued judicial monitoring.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a classic case where, despite several orders having been passed by this Court since 2015 in the aforesaid Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation, the matter requires cognizance to be taken each year during the monsoon, in view of the deplorable condition of the roads, with potholes continuing to cause deaths and injuries to persons. They shall be made aware that the right to have properly maintained streets is a fundamental right of citizens. The circulars shall state that a disciplinary action will be initiated against the erring officials.

Procedural History

24.07.2013: Letter by Justice G.S. Patel highlighting road conditions; 29.07.2013: Suo Motu PIL registered; 13.08.2013: Order referring to Government Resolution; 12.02.2015: Intervention application of Ms. Thakkar allowed; 20.05.2015: Detailed interim directions issued; thereafter, continued monitoring each monsoon; 19.09.2025: Matter reserved for order; 13.10.2025: Order pronounced.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act i...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication on Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that the Reference Court must consider all relevant evidence including sale instance...