Supreme Court Issues Directions in PIL on Judicial Infrastructure and Access to Justice - Court Emphasizes Need for Adequate Court Halls and Digital Infrastructure. The Court directed Union and States to file compliance reports on steps taken to improve judicial infrastructure, including court halls and residential accommodation.

  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by S. Rajaseekaran seeking directions to the Union of India and State Governments to improve judicial infrastructure across the country. The Supreme Court, hearing the matter on 07-10-2025, noted that despite earlier orders, there has been insufficient progress in providing adequate court halls, residential accommodation for judges, and digital infrastructure. The Court appointed Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Senior Advocate, as Amicus Curiae to assist. The Court directed all States and Union Territories to file compliance affidavits within four weeks detailing the steps taken to augment infrastructure. It also directed the Union of India to coordinate with the States and submit a consolidated report. The Court emphasized that access to justice is a fundamental right under Article 21 and that the State has a constitutional obligation to provide necessary infrastructure. The matter was adjourned for further hearing to allow compliance.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Judicial Infrastructure - Access to Justice - Constitution of India, Article 21 - The Supreme Court considered the adequacy of judicial infrastructure including court halls, residential accommodation, and digital facilities. The Court noted that despite previous orders, progress has been slow and directed the Union and States to file compliance reports and take concrete steps to bridge the gap. (Paras 1-3)

B) Constitutional Law - Separation of Powers - Judicial Independence - Constitution of India, Article 50 - The Court emphasized that adequate infrastructure is essential for judicial independence and access to justice. It directed the formation of a committee to monitor implementation and report back. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Union of India and State Governments have taken adequate steps to provide sufficient court halls, residential accommodation for judges, and digital infrastructure for the judiciary, and what directions are necessary to ensure access to justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed all States and Union Territories to file compliance affidavits within four weeks detailing steps taken to augment judicial infrastructure, including court halls and residential accommodation. The Union of India was directed to coordinate and submit a consolidated report. The matter was adjourned for further hearing.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Judicial Infrastructure
  • Access to Justice
  • Constitutional Obligations
  • Directions to Union and States
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (10) 88

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 295/2012

2025-10-07

J.B. Pardiwala, K.V. Viswanathan

Gaurav Agrawal (Amicus Curiae), Krishna Kumar, Vinodh Kanna B, Shivang Thapiliyal, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Vikramjit Banerjee, Sudarshan Lamba, Swarupama Chaturvedi, Sharath Nambiar, B.K. Satija, T.S. Sabarish, Debojit Borkakati, Viresh B. Saharya, Prerna Mehta, Amit Anand Tiwari, Sabarish Subramanian, Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Jahnavi Taneja, Danish Saifi, Arputham Aruna And Co, Aishwarya Bhati, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Sunita Sharma, Ishaan Sharma, Annirudh Sharma II, Jagdish Chandra Solanki, Kunal Mimani, Parag Chaturvedi, Sumit Gupta, Jaikriti S. Jadeja, Akshay Tiwari, Tanya Shrotriya, Shivang Goel, Juhi Bhargava, Rashmi Nandakumar, Yashmita Pandey, Shuvodeep Roy, Deepayan Dutta, Saurabh Tripathi, D. K. Devesh, Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, Deepanwita Priyanka, Satyalipsu Ray, Prashant Bhagwati, Priyal Sheth, Raghvendra Kumar, Devina Sehgal, Yatharth Kansal, Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Karun Sharma, Anupama Ngangom, Rajkumari Divyasana, Ruchira Gupta, Shishir Deshpande, Pooja Tripathi, Amit Kumar, Abhishek Verma, Avijit Mani Tripathi, T.K. Nayak, Pranaya Kumar Mohapatra, V. Shyamohan, Sanjay Jain, Rajat Bhardwaj, Baani Khanna, Robin Singh, Kapil Balwani, Satyajeet Kumar, Astha Sharma, Shantanu Sagar, Anil Kumar, Gunjesh Ranjan, Manoneet Dwivedi, Prakash Kumarmangalam, Abhishek Kumar Gupta

S. Rajaseekaran

Union of India and Ors. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation concerning inadequate judicial infrastructure across India.

Remedy Sought

Directions to Union of India and State Governments to provide adequate court halls, residential accommodation for judges, and digital infrastructure.

Filing Reason

Alleged failure of the State to provide necessary infrastructure for the judiciary, hampering access to justice.

Issues

Whether the Union and States have taken adequate steps to improve judicial infrastructure. What directions are necessary to ensure access to justice under Article 21.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite earlier orders, progress on judicial infrastructure is insufficient. Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agrawal assisted the Court in identifying gaps and suggesting measures.

Ratio Decidendi

Access to justice is a fundamental right under Article 21, and the State has a constitutional obligation to provide adequate judicial infrastructure. The Court can issue directions to ensure compliance.

Judgment Excerpts

HEARD BY : HON. J.B. PARDIWALA AND HON. K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ. MR. GAURAV AGRAWAL, SENIOR ADVOCATE IS AMICUS CURIAE

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2012. The matter was heard on 07-10-2025 for pronouncement of order. Various IAs were filed seeking appropriate orders/directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 50
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Issues Directions in PIL on Judicial Infrastructure and Access to Justice - Court Emphasizes Need for Adequate Court Halls and Digital Infrastructure. The Court directed Union and States to file compliance reports on steps taken to impr...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Decides Appeals Against MACT Award in Motor Accident Claims. Parties Dispute Compensation Amount and Liability of Insurers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.